Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

discuss - Re: [opennic-discuss] Never mind the 1,000, target the 1,000,000,000

discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org

Subject: Discuss mailing list

List archive

Re: [opennic-discuss] Never mind the 1,000, target the 1,000,000,000


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Andrew Norton <ktetch AT gmail.com>
  • To: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
  • Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] Never mind the 1,000, target the 1,000,000,000
  • Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2012 22:01:15 -0500
  • Authentication-results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of ktetch AT gmail.com designates 10.236.190.199 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=ktetch AT gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=ktetch AT gmail.com

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 2/19/2012 9:58 PM, Mike wrote:
> What about an appliance-like linux distro, whld something like that do
> the trick, sort of like those firewall appliance type distros?
>
> I don't think it would be terribly difficult to role our own linux
> distro appliance thingy, eh?
>
> But, would that be the ticket?

Hardly.
"easiest way to use OpenNIC... Install a whole new OS!

>
> --Mike
>
> On 02/19/2012 09:42 PM, Andrew Norton wrote:
>> I've been on this list for 14 months now, and I've seen a lot of stuff.
>> Mostly it's been "new T2's".
>>
>> What I have *NOT* seen, is anything for the real audience, the everyday
>> user.
>>
>> I'm a fairly techie guy (used to design robots for the nuclear industry,
>> currently work for a tech news site, and on a distributed computing
>> project that designs particle accelerators) and yet, I'm stuck with
>> OpenNIC.
>>
>> What few guides and documents there are, are geared towards the 1000
>> (estimate only) that would like to run a T2. For someone like me, who
>> has VERY limited knowledge about this topic, there's almost nothing.
>> That's not good.
>>
>> Imagine a car. It may have the BEST engine in the world, but if it's in
>> the bodyshell, and with the controls of a Ford Model T, no-one will want
>> one. You will get a few enthusiasts, but the mass market will say 'looks
>> ugly, and too hard to use' and you will have effectively wasted most of
>> your time.
>>
>> It's the same problem linux had 15 years ago. It was designed for
>> specialists in that field by other people in that field. It wasn't until
>> the likes of Ubuntu, with its userfriendlyness that it started to become
>> a viable alternative.
>>
>> It's a VERY common failing with tech-groups. Everyone you see and talk
>> to has a good knowledge on the subject, so you forget about the everyday
>> person that knows nothing. Instead, because it's 'obvious', you ignore
>> userfriendlyness, to focus on more cool new tech stuff.
>> The number of groups I've been involved with over the years that has
>> done this will astound you.
>>
>> The best test is to, every now and then, step back and say "that woman a
>> few doors away, could she use this, if she really wanted to, without
>> leaving our site?"
>> If the answer is no, you've got a userfriendlyness problem.
>>
>> I brought this up in the IRC chan already, but I was advised to bung it
>> here as well, so here it is.
>>


- --
Andrew Norton
http://ktetch.co.uk
Tel: +1(352)6-KTETCH [+1-352-658-3824]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPQbd7AAoJECjjuYTW3X5HKG4IAOnngH7GSgUxHrvUFxHPWhxb
c7mYLzntvTHki88PRsFVAl4YrRhk1PEV8eArV+Lh4zatH8HWQt0jefbpMOixpoU8
YMHeall0Wnf7haoclo5XRKQ88bWou6fraG+/ltsAb/0PYSMy9o8IWmu/y/wD5vuA
UvhMBK+YVbUJ/ZGkiICaIOZQ2fy8uVWnMeMG3xp6lCoeG3Us/IjGnCkWKPYOrypb
QK4x3a9H06QW9dZwFr1zDbmkx0+p50YpU0g34Tyv/1Z8re39JJExAc7A6KwD+vzx
Ws34xQokTe/B500aY7fF5YwsAXBUneNUlVezhiMi/8kD6b3z9oyZg3P4juJVfDg=
=ZsnT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page