Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

discuss - Re: [opennic-discuss] Never mind the 1,000, target the 1,000,000,000

discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org

Subject: Discuss mailing list

List archive

Re: [opennic-discuss] Never mind the 1,000, target the 1,000,000,000


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Maximi89 <maximi89 AT gmail.com>
  • To: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
  • Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] Never mind the 1,000, target the 1,000,000,000
  • Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 01:41:58 -0300
  • Authentication-results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of maximi89 AT gmail.com designates 10.152.144.4 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=maximi89 AT gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=maximi89 AT gmail.com



2012/2/20 Amrit Panesar <apanesar AT 4195tech.com>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 2/19/2012 7:01 PM, Andrew Norton wrote:
> On 2/19/2012 9:58 PM, Mike wrote:
> > What about an appliance-like linux distro, whld something like that do
> > the trick, sort of like those firewall appliance type distros?
<snip>
>
>
> Hardly.
> "easiest way to use OpenNIC... Install a whole new OS!

Good points from both sides.
I think we ought to convince ISPs to start resolving OpenNIC domains.

An other perhaps make linux packages that can be installed easily,
alters the DNS settings and keeps the DNS settings updated (perhaps on
boot, or via crontab).

I'm currently working on a windows app that does this as well, it
gathers ping averages from the client to all active T2's, verifies that
the end user's ISP isn't hijacking outbound DNS queries, and updates
regularly (without user intervention).

I feel that these ideas might be a step forward in the correct
direction, but there still much more work that needs to be done..
Perhaps an "idiot proof" guide to OpenNIC is in order.

There is a tool called NameBench, we could use for the GNU&Linux users...
or like you said a tool doing "ping", so this way we can choose the best.

we can use a tool who download a list of servers, the one who OpenNIC have for T2 operators.
Then try all of them and choose the best.

probably we could try a unique GUI but differents logics for Windows, GNU/Linux and MacOS
 
- --
Amrit Panesar
OpeNIC .Neo Administrator
[ @neo_desktop ]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPQbqRAAoJEA/K84XwmW5a43IH/1sGF0OnX2abMwZogTChzLZ8
t5d2JKj77grcwzH/DjtDf96s1kFqyqoIx43rB/3xmyojpaxU/LcaLIfo6sVpYanh
bocW3ydk9KWFhQWA1Bkk9f7WxKdrZxVRj17xxLRzJVWJeBGGBBEK8JXwvVMAwEtK
KB+NIQF2VF/hR+W7VSbOP4j2SepJ6+1hQTpZK5dloZGipuL05rpl5qSCnbbawOgg
eLqkQhCQgDIL9Z9FvAvPLDO6PeikYW+7SSwgPQsTHwRHd9PikPTObZJ+Ynx7Sm+5
+7I7aEHnhOvIzvKVwPgCjm90a7zl/Kgh49Eu4SfDQ/HwSbMkEIRWHKrGwk2z08o=
=WeWr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




--
Maximiliano Augusto Castañón Araneda
Santiago, Chile
Linux user # 394821

Skype: maximi89
MSN: maximi89 AT gmail.com
XMPP/Jabber: maximi89 AT gmail.com



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page