Discuss mailing list

[Brian Koontz <brian AT opennicproject.org>]

Amrit & Philippe--

I have an idea:

If someone can consolidate everything into a single wiki page, I will
set up some server-side code that will simply generate the PDF from
the wiki page.  I think this would be preferable over having to keep
track of information spanning a number of resources.  

I don't have time to do the consolidating, but can certainly configure
the wiki to generate the PDF/html/whatever.

  --Brian

-- 
OpenNIC (the sequel) co-founder and wikimaster
IRC: Freenode.net channel #opennic

On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 10:44:29AM -0700, Amrit Panesar wrote:
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>  
> There are a few wiki entries, but I would like to see some PDFs
> available. Perhaps someone could make one, as well as provide example
> charters and the general OpenNIC Policies.
> 
> http://wiki.opennic.glue/CreatingNewTLDs
> http://wiki.opennic.glue/RunningT1
> http://wiki.opennic.glue/Tier2ServerConfig
> 
> 
> On 3/11/2012 9:31 AM, JP Blankert (Thuis PC) wrote:
> > Would an applicant's guidebook be useful for such new requests?
> >
> > Please not as thick as Icann's, but maybe 10-12 page, as guideline,
> what has a chance and what not?
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Philippe
> > (also altroot.com)
> >
> >> Well, I thought OpenNIC was against two letter TLDs (thought it was
> >> policy), but if everyone is OK with that, then as long as the
> >> technical side is OK I'll vote for it. Makes me think of possibly
> >> doing a '.ns' TLD for NationStates.net. Would be an interesting
> >> experiment. And I can only imagine what would happen with .eq.
> >>
> >> On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 5:41 PM, Bersl<bersl2 AT bersl2.info> wrote:
> > On 03/08/2012 04:15 PM, Julian DeMarchi wrote:
> > >>>> Any TLD that helps OpenNIC will have my vote. Before bringing this
> > >>>> TLD to a vote in 7 days, I'd like to one thing.
> > 7 days might be too abbreviated a timescale. Working-registry
> > requirements being why I said it was a "proto-proposal". I suppose I
> > actually expected opposition to the idea and worked more on
> > counterarguments and counter-counterarguments in the last few days.
> > Luckily, these are my days off from work, so I can actually get some
> > things done with the rest of today and tomorrow.
> >
> > Events are moving faster than I expected, but I'm not exactly
> > complaining. :)
> >>
> >> -----
> >> Geen virus gevonden in dit bericht.
> >> Gecontroleerd door AVG - www.avg.com
> >> Versie: 2012.0.1913 / Virusdatabase: 2114/4860 - datum van uitgifte:
> 03/09/12
> >>
> >>
> >
> 
> - -- 
> Amrit Panesar
> OpeNIC .Neo Administrator
> [ @neo_desktop ]
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (MingW32)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>  
> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPXjX8AAoJEA/K84XwmW5aw98IAJcd8ZdnCVE1Yf1d64zqsQZe
> QFC07qxCCTzFUF5frzcmsdYKlFgyRaVpfU80Oqu9vAumlwDtbeFpE559naywfWMq
> iChPGg41Ic5z8vAHTj8E0Ou3M0TjxZ8Z95DQXOkT+2Rma1iC72Yp20WVXmUPRHpr
> aLfsqAEuN1AqxHR5OLaG4EQBNY+sVz5aLVAm0MwdZr7cvJzSk5HTEKe55GXyZByU
> Dm84CLAAZ/h02xm3zPZIHchNS5J8t36YGZ4oK+JeN7DRL/7WJthfPBD7Ux+EX5O1
> GJyqFfQzT8GYxeZboXwS5MqN/zbx2XOLxWIGR6mcjltjfPUw0/lOiAPzPT0bXUU=
> =vT/y
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>