Discuss mailing list

["JP Blankert (Thuis PC)" <jpblankert AT zonnet.nl>]

Would an applicant's guidebook be useful for such new requests?

Please not as thick as Icann's, but maybe 10-12 page, as guideline, what 
has a chance and what not?

Best regards,

Philippe
(also altroot.com)

> Well, I thought OpenNIC was against two letter TLDs (thought it was
> policy), but if everyone is OK with that, then as long as the
> technical side is OK I'll vote for it. Makes me think of possibly
> doing a '.ns' TLD for NationStates.net. Would be an interesting
> experiment. And I can only imagine what would happen with .eq.
>
> On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 5:41 PM, Bersl<bersl2 AT bersl2.info>  wrote:
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > On 03/08/2012 04:15 PM, Julian DeMarchi wrote:
> > > Any TLD that helps OpenNIC will have my vote. Before bringing this
> > > TLD to a vote in 7 days, I'd like to one thing.
> > 7 days might be too abbreviated a timescale. Working-registry
> > requirements being why I said it was a "proto-proposal". I suppose I
> > actually expected opposition to the idea and worked more on
> > counterarguments and counter-counterarguments in the last few days.
> > Luckily, these are my days off from work, so I can actually get some
> > things done with the rest of today and tomorrow.
> >
> > Events are moving faster than I expected, but I'm not exactly
> > complaining. :)
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
> > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
> >
> > iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPWV/aAAoJEGZIAx6yDQgGoNkIAKNYG6oLYyEFckChl5MbCWla
> > 9H5Rll/RL03HzpJOoJ90K+dk7XPQ0zgZx+drjfSi+YxB/CkBRmDPil22GtoEGupD
> > 8mZiBLSptQF1SchwHjD6Jai7yd6qf2kwwHrOL8JuNHJUZXF795bePmM3uuZb3Azz
> > YFV77chVTymbmMAh/4Q891hRPSO/yRdicWJRdtrR7oDhhNCbB2koNKU/gLaOkuZT
> > haYDTwBCxfSarLTTkRmh4qI6prL3eAuQBauIoaDYIEYybVrpGgS8Yx4oo+3A3wI2
> > 3H+LiowzQiO+9nA4M7lLwkZAPhad9xZhyLsTne6CM7flm/YxrQ0Xled5lTa88NM=
> > =l2fG
> > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> -----
> Geen virus gevonden in dit bericht.
> Gecontroleerd door AVG - www.avg.com
> Versie: 2012.0.1913 / Virusdatabase: 2114/4860 - datum van uitgifte: 03/09/12