Discuss mailing list

[Christopher <weblionx AT gmail.com>]

Well, I thought OpenNIC was against two letter TLDs (thought it was
policy), but if everyone is OK with that, then as long as the
technical side is OK I'll vote for it. Makes me think of possibly
doing a '.ns' TLD for NationStates.net. Would be an interesting
experiment. And I can only imagine what would happen with .eq.

On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 5:41 PM, Bersl <bersl2 AT bersl2.info> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 03/08/2012 04:15 PM, Julian DeMarchi wrote:
>> Any TLD that helps OpenNIC will have my vote. Before bringing this
>> TLD to a vote in 7 days, I'd like to one thing.
>
> 7 days might be too abbreviated a timescale. Working-registry
> requirements being why I said it was a "proto-proposal". I suppose I
> actually expected opposition to the idea and worked more on
> counterarguments and counter-counterarguments in the last few days.
> Luckily, these are my days off from work, so I can actually get some
> things done with the rest of today and tomorrow.
>
> Events are moving faster than I expected, but I'm not exactly
> complaining. :)
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>
> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPWV/aAAoJEGZIAx6yDQgGoNkIAKNYG6oLYyEFckChl5MbCWla
> 9H5Rll/RL03HzpJOoJ90K+dk7XPQ0zgZx+drjfSi+YxB/CkBRmDPil22GtoEGupD
> 8mZiBLSptQF1SchwHjD6Jai7yd6qf2kwwHrOL8JuNHJUZXF795bePmM3uuZb3Azz
> YFV77chVTymbmMAh/4Q891hRPSO/yRdicWJRdtrR7oDhhNCbB2koNKU/gLaOkuZT
> haYDTwBCxfSarLTTkRmh4qI6prL3eAuQBauIoaDYIEYybVrpGgS8Yx4oo+3A3wI2
> 3H+LiowzQiO+9nA4M7lLwkZAPhad9xZhyLsTne6CM7flm/YxrQ0Xled5lTa88NM=
> =l2fG
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----