Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

discuss - Re: applicants'guidbook useful? [opennic-discuss] proto-proposal for new TLD: .eq

discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org

Subject: Discuss mailing list

List archive

Re: applicants'guidbook useful? [opennic-discuss] proto-proposal for new TLD: .eq


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Amrit Panesar <apanesar AT 4195tech.com>
  • To: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
  • Subject: Re: applicants'guidbook useful? [opennic-discuss] proto-proposal for new TLD: .eq
  • Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 10:44:29 -0700


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
 
There are a few wiki entries, but I would like to see some PDFs available. Perhaps someone could make one, as well as provide example charters and the general OpenNIC Policies.

http://wiki.opennic.glue/CreatingNewTLDs
http://wiki.opennic.glue/RunningT1
http://wiki.opennic.glue/Tier2ServerConfig


On 3/11/2012 9:31 AM, JP Blankert (Thuis PC) wrote:
> Would an applicant's guidebook be useful for such new requests?
>
> Please not as thick as Icann's, but maybe 10-12 page, as guideline, what has a chance and what not?
>
> Best regards,
>
> Philippe
> (also altroot.com)
>
>> Well, I thought OpenNIC was against two letter TLDs (thought it was
>> policy), but if everyone is OK with that, then as long as the
>> technical side is OK I'll vote for it. Makes me think of possibly
>> doing a '.ns' TLD for NationStates.net. Would be an interesting
>> experiment. And I can only imagine what would happen with .eq.
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 5:41 PM, Bersl<bersl2 AT bersl2.info> wrote:
> On 03/08/2012 04:15 PM, Julian DeMarchi wrote:
> >>>> Any TLD that helps OpenNIC will have my vote. Before bringing this
> >>>> TLD to a vote in 7 days, I'd like to one thing.
> 7 days might be too abbreviated a timescale. Working-registry
> requirements being why I said it was a "proto-proposal". I suppose I
> actually expected opposition to the idea and worked more on
> counterarguments and counter-counterarguments in the last few days.
> Luckily, these are my days off from work, so I can actually get some
> things done with the rest of today and tomorrow.
>
> Events are moving faster than I expected, but I'm not exactly
> complaining. :)
>>
>> -----
>> Geen virus gevonden in dit bericht.
>> Gecontroleerd door AVG - www.avg.com
>> Versie: 2012.0.1913 / Virusdatabase: 2114/4860 - datum van uitgifte: 03/09/12
>>
>>
>


- --
Amrit Panesar
OpeNIC .Neo Administrator
[ @neo_desktop ]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
 
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPXjX8AAoJEA/K84XwmW5aw98IAJcd8ZdnCVE1Yf1d64zqsQZe
QFC07qxCCTzFUF5frzcmsdYKlFgyRaVpfU80Oqu9vAumlwDtbeFpE559naywfWMq
iChPGg41Ic5z8vAHTj8E0Ou3M0TjxZ8Z95DQXOkT+2Rma1iC72Yp20WVXmUPRHpr
aLfsqAEuN1AqxHR5OLaG4EQBNY+sVz5aLVAm0MwdZr7cvJzSk5HTEKe55GXyZByU
Dm84CLAAZ/h02xm3zPZIHchNS5J8t36YGZ4oK+JeN7DRL/7WJthfPBD7Ux+EX5O1
GJyqFfQzT8GYxeZboXwS5MqN/zbx2XOLxWIGR6mcjltjfPUw0/lOiAPzPT0bXUU=
=vT/y
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page