discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
Subject: Discuss mailing list
List archive
- From: sjeap <sjeap AT lavabit.com>
- To: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
- Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] OpenNIC website
- Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 14:14:41 +0200
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=lavabit; d=lavabit.com; b=GXSPlTrkr2Bru5g6RYK8XmL1+LpP+lfc0jOVh+2DT73wvYBd+us0CnLSSbI7EpjB1kkCPbTrDps2AaCuFAwSE4mBVywa5onO5bZB3fcvCfpDMcB4dCf4YAohOy7Lq83rz1Znke3dUDsMSruHFY5qika6KEBSxdkRmbTcQimVICw=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:X-Enigmail-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding;
Hello Richard,
Could you check the links, please?
Regards sjeap
Am 16.06.2012 00:21, schrieb Richard Lyons:
> curses. I forgot to give the new url.
>
> It is
>
> https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B0D2_zh4skGSWWlDWWRucGtYVXM/
>
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 20:02:24 +0100, Richard Lyons wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 17:03:03 +0200, sjeap wrote:
>>
>>> These are some good drafts for the logo, nice work. I would like to
>>> propose a combination of the second bottommost one at the left side
>>> (https://docs.google.com/open?id=0B0D2_zh4skGSelBVdTFNbUM4U1E/) and the
>>> logo's partial open circle (http://wiki.opennic.glue/). That would look
>>> much better than the current (really huge) one at
>>> http://www.opennicproject.org/.
>>
>> I don't immediately see how to combine the style of the two logos.
>>
>> However, I have made a couple of minor changes:
>>
>> I have "opened" the "o" and also added the corresponding version in a
>> single line. The lower left hand box contains the normal reversed and
>> single-line versions of that idea, and the "oN" logotype in the bottom
>> right would be its favicon, avatar, symbol mode. The shape is
>> sufficiently idiosyncratic that all versions could be used in
>> appropriate circumstances. The logotype can be seen as a node in the
>> corner, or as a small 'o' overlapping the capital 'N', or as some sort
>> of highlight. It serves as a unique identifying detail obviously.
>>
>> In this example, I have also reduced the sixe of the "NIC" slightly,
>> only in the reverse (white-on-black) version. If this idea were
>> persued, that would probably be a good idea.
>>
>> Anyway, I won't waste any more time on that doodle unless people think
>> it is worth refining. Some of the spacing is crap.
>
> The doodle is here
> https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B0D2_zh4skGSWWlDWWRucGtYVXM/
>
>>
>> richard
-------- Original-Nachricht --------
Betreff: Re: [opennic-discuss] OpenNIC website
Datum: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 17:03:03 +0200
Von: sjeap <sjeap AT lavabit.com>
Antwort an: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
An: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
> These are some good drafts for the logo, nice work. I would like to
> propose a combination of the second bottommost one at the left side
> (https://docs.google.com/open?id=0B0D2_zh4skGSelBVdTFNbUM4U1E/) and the
> logo's partial open circle (http://wiki.opennic.glue/). That would look
> much better than the current (really huge) one at
> http://www.opennicproject.org/.
>
> Regards sjeap
>
> Am 15.06.2012 12:46, schrieb Richard Lyons:
>> > On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 11:20:48 +0100, Peter Green wrote:
>> >
>>> >> I'm happy to have a go at replacing the new logo with an updated old
>>> >> one, I agree, it would be better.
>> >
>> > Has someone got the old one handy?
>> >
>> > I was pondering along other lines, following comments on another thread
>> > and did a couple of preliminary doodles
>> > https://docs.google.com/open?id=0B0D2_zh4skGSelBVdTFNbUM4U1E
>> >
>> > My intentions being
>> >
>> > 1 to express "open" in a rather simplistic way
>> >
>> > 2 to have am extractable mini-logo for favicons, etc.
>> >
>> > 3 in the later doodles to express "network" (also in a simplistic way)
>> >
>> > I don't know if that is useful to anybody.
>> >
>> > Richard
- Re: [opennic-discuss] OpenNIC website, (continued)
- Re: [opennic-discuss] OpenNIC website, Tim Groeneveld, 06/14/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] OpenNIC website, Richard Lyons, 06/15/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] OpenNIC website, Tim Groeneveld, 06/15/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] OpenNIC website, Richard Lyons, 06/15/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] OpenNIC website, Alex Hanselka, 06/15/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] OpenNIC website, Tim Groeneveld, 06/15/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] OpenNIC website, Richard Lyons, 06/15/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] OpenNIC website, Peter Green, 06/15/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] OpenNIC website, Richard Lyons, 06/15/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] OpenNIC website, sjeap, 06/15/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] OpenNIC website, Richard Lyons, 06/15/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] OpenNIC website, Richard Lyons, 06/15/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] OpenNIC website, sjeap, 06/16/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] OpenNIC website, Richard Lyons, 06/16/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] OpenNIC website, Falk Husemann, 06/16/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] OpenNIC website, Richard Lyons, 06/16/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] OpenNIC website, Falk Husemann, 06/16/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] OpenNIC website, Richard Lyons, 06/16/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] OpenNIC website, Falk Husemann, 06/16/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] OpenNIC website, Richard Lyons, 06/17/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] OpenNIC website, sjeap, 06/16/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] OpenNIC website, Richard Lyons, 06/15/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] OpenNIC website, sjeap, 06/16/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] OpenNIC website, Jon Hebb, 06/16/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] OpenNIC website, Richard Lyons, 06/16/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] OpenNIC website, Richard Lyons, 06/15/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] OpenNIC website, sjeap, 06/15/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] OpenNIC website, Richard Lyons, 06/15/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] OpenNIC website, Tim Groeneveld, 06/14/2012
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.