discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
Subject: Discuss mailing list
List archive
- From: sjeap <sjeap AT lavabit.com>
- To: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
- Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] OpenNIC website
- Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 17:03:03 +0200
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=lavabit; d=lavabit.com; b=3NtQeZzmQBuKapwn9ocFou9PUILQADTi8kqhbA+P+95Act6dqSXEvZ2o3cpvN1/FkYNm41yG4jB36mzuumv3le1W2P+sgquVXcLbFeOoY4A67zR63/gSfvocd6QYk/NyqSw4+FgfiYk/zallQyJdp7cpgNnV7GD/J0JdpC48WM0=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:X-Enigmail-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding;
These are some good drafts for the logo, nice work. I would like to
propose a combination of the second bottommost one at the left side
(https://docs.google.com/open?id=0B0D2_zh4skGSelBVdTFNbUM4U1E/) and the
logo's partial open circle (http://wiki.opennic.glue/). That would look
much better than the current (really huge) one at
http://www.opennicproject.org/.
Regards sjeap
Am 15.06.2012 12:46, schrieb Richard Lyons:
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 11:20:48 +0100, Peter Green wrote:
>
>> I'm happy to have a go at replacing the new logo with an updated old one,
>> I agree, it would be better.
>
> Has someone got the old one handy?
>
> I was pondering along other lines, following comments on another thread
> and did a couple of preliminary doodles
> https://docs.google.com/open?id=0B0D2_zh4skGSelBVdTFNbUM4U1E
>
> My intentions being
>
> 1 to express "open" in a rather simplistic way
>
> 2 to have am extractable mini-logo for favicons, etc.
>
> 3 in the later doodles to express "network" (also in a simplistic way)
>
> I don't know if that is useful to anybody.
>
> Richard
- Re: [opennic-discuss] OpenNIC website, (continued)
- Re: [opennic-discuss] OpenNIC website, Alex Hanselka, 06/14/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] OpenNIC website, Jon Hebb, 06/14/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] OpenNIC website, Dale, 06/14/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] OpenNIC website, Tim Groeneveld, 06/14/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] OpenNIC website, Richard Lyons, 06/15/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] OpenNIC website, Tim Groeneveld, 06/15/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] OpenNIC website, Richard Lyons, 06/15/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] OpenNIC website, Alex Hanselka, 06/15/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] OpenNIC website, Tim Groeneveld, 06/15/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] OpenNIC website, Richard Lyons, 06/15/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] OpenNIC website, Tim Groeneveld, 06/14/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] OpenNIC website, Peter Green, 06/15/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] OpenNIC website, Richard Lyons, 06/15/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] OpenNIC website, sjeap, 06/15/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] OpenNIC website, Richard Lyons, 06/15/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] OpenNIC website, Richard Lyons, 06/15/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] OpenNIC website, sjeap, 06/16/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] OpenNIC website, Richard Lyons, 06/16/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] OpenNIC website, Falk Husemann, 06/16/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] OpenNIC website, Richard Lyons, 06/16/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] OpenNIC website, Falk Husemann, 06/16/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] OpenNIC website, Richard Lyons, 06/16/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] OpenNIC website, Falk Husemann, 06/16/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] OpenNIC website, Richard Lyons, 06/17/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] OpenNIC website, sjeap, 06/16/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] OpenNIC website, Richard Lyons, 06/15/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] OpenNIC website, Richard Lyons, 06/15/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] OpenNIC website, sjeap, 06/15/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] OpenNIC website, Richard Lyons, 06/15/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] OpenNIC website, Alex Hanselka, 06/14/2012
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.