Discuss mailing list

[Bersl <bersl2 AT bersl2.info>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 08/28/2012 07:22 PM, Martin C wrote:
>> suggesting replication of the user records for any TLD,
>> presumably to a central opennic server/repo. In other words, the
>> TLD owner would still maintain them, but if they blew up /
>> disappeared / were unresponsive, there wouldn't be a total loss
>> of that data.
> If I may throw this out there, that was/is one of the design goals
> of the RM-API that I am working on (in case it needs to be
> mentioned, the RM-API design in no way relies upon MUD4TLD, so
> anyone could use it). It also comes with it's own WHOIS server
> which is already working.
> 
> I can speed up development on the replication feature of the API
> if anyone is interested.
> 

What is the nature of the over-the-wire protocol? Is it XML-, JSON-,
or YAML-based, since there are already parsers available?

I bring this up because whenever I finish up the initial version of my
own attempt at domain registry software, it should not be too much
more difficult to add a CRUD/REST interface, and the library I'm
eyeing speaks these data representations natively.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQPWNiAAoJEKDJEQNczrCUUZkH/0wc8B/06TqBMsa7mG79p4K5
wgjYh4ggy9nWUcL4C4HjPs2YmZHtZsS2+r6c3iVDsDEAK18Yr+fDI1Y3L3xIyPS9
K/n5NR8F/4QoT8AIgqs01tE/GBqR9YgArAEcisNme1srz93MiwXUM3R6x7tP+TJ8
berwNtwcSgmeCYrwE9NflIaGOQq/R0u3YK3bWbF+Q3CPvp9Q2ZhwziI4COc2OUKq
/N0dsWuEq9KJDNZHn8DLQIEr4qXJKx+M8EGwEujsR8Ehr+EMMRtPToOMUliFDzMD
Da7gMoc3a9PBmy3mXKeJe24oU3LqXngs4Rjw+8u1EUPHM3EhXih4je1793HoyyQ=
=4Zku
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----