discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org

Subject: Discuss mailing list

List archive

Re: [opennic-discuss] The website

From: Richard Lyons <richard AT the-place.net>
To: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] The website
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 22:03:27 +0000
Comment: DKIM? See http://www.dkim.org
Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=the-place.net; h=Received:X-Qmail-Scanner-Diagnostics:X-Qmail-Scanner-Mail-From:X-Qmail-Scanner:Received:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:User-Agent; b=kg7A7l4fXryTTwxsK2bTK8TDfBExfLUR/j7YIuijzi6iiHoh0IzoYOkb6dRWAj C62ZeB6jIBfJoon9mBMwPSSM5pbcECLvK/0lVQaodVAJk0b2G3Nl3yyJHOgvaV4X LRkFyeM8tUBbh5+PdBYi3PNIv1qrNqA+nz0N7TIsruO0E=;

On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 21:46:36 +0000, Peter Green wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> > I now just want to complain about it being too fuzzy.
>
> I converted it to a .png file as I didn't think .svg would render in a
> browser. I see they do, at least locally, and I can try it in the
> website, though I have never heard of anyone using .svg's in web
> development, plus .jpg and .png's are the ones that are recommended.

AFAIK, older browsers will not render vector graphics, so png is
preferable.

richard

Re: [opennic-discuss] The website, (continued)