Discuss mailing list

[Guillaume Parent <gparent AT gparent.org>]

Don't bother bringing up baseless "theories" about who hacked you before you can even prove you were hacked in the first place. The problem is not your English. The problem is what you're implying in your baseless "theories".

How would you react if I said I had a theory that you're a terrorist child molester? Would it matter that it's just a theory? Would it matter that "It could be true or not" ?

No. You'd hate me for it, and rightfully so.

On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 5:15 PM, Alejandro Bonet <albogoal AT gmail.com> wrote:

Jeff: An accusation needs an accusated.

Who is that?...

All the email list?...

Im sure my english is not the best.

If someone has been offended by my bad english, i ask for excuses to all them.

Perhaps im unfriendly for many people here.
But, please, dont look to my form.
Look to my bottom.

Alejandro Bonet
albogoal AT gmail.com


2014-03-05 18:08 GMT+01:00, Alejandro Bonet <albogoal AT gmail.com>:

> Yes Guillaume: I almost agree with you:
>
> "Domain names are public. The list of every domain queried on a
> particular server is not."
>
> But i dont said which server.
> Also i dont said it was the entire list of every domain queried to
> that unknow server.
>
> OK?
>
> Please: If you dont like the proposal of Frank (to ask us about public
> domain names to get
> the hashes and, perhaps, fight against some program invented by
> someones to censor the internet trought DNS, or decipher it to
> contribute to a better free internet, or to denunce publicly the
> someones trying to censor), please say it to Frank.
>
> I understand the Frank question.
> I answer it as i can.
> I dont know his motivations, but they seem honest.
>
> As it seems, Frank does not follow this list with the same frequency
> as you or me.
>
> There are lots of web accesible listings of domain names.
>
> Thats all.
>
> Alejandro Bonet
> albogoal AT gmail.com
>
> PD: Nova King, i dont understand why you are offended by my suggestion
> that "perhaps some bad guys are listen this email list"...
>
> It is only "a theory"...
>
> If true, no matter with you or me... We can do anything to avoid that.
>
> And Guillaume has again another reason: It is completely baseless.
>
> But also it is completely baseless to mantain in absolut terms that
> "all the subscriptors are proved good guys"...
>
> I think that most of them are good guys, in fact im sure of that...
> But perhaps not all.
>
> And i think we need to remember that allways...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 2014-03-05 17:47 GMT+01:00, Guillaume Parent <gparent AT gparent.org>:
>> The list of domains queried on a DNS server is not public until the
>> operator of that DNS server makes it public. Stop implying otherwise,
>> because it is factually wrong.
>>
>> Domain names are public. The list of every domain queried on a particular
>> server is not.
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 4:41 PM, Alejandro Bonet <albogoal AT gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I dont know if the word shit (you likes it so much) have the mean i
>>> think...
>>>
>>> I dont "acusse the list" at all, as you say.
>>>
>>> I only say maybe there are some bad guys listen it.
>>>
>>> The data is public or PUBLIC (if you dont like caps, it's your problem).
>>>
>>> The data is collected from google, which is public, and dns queries
>>> trasversing all the internet
>>> in clear. Frank says he has collected amounts of these data from other
>>> public sources.
>>>
>>> To post these data into this semipublic list for subscriptors dont
>>> make "more public" the
>>> data.
>>>
>>> Alejandro Bonet
>>> albogoal AT gmail.com
>>>
>>> PD: But you have reason in one thing: It was bad idea to post the
>>> data...
>>>
>>> Because perhaps now, i cant stop your SHIT verborrea!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --------
>>> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
>>> You may unsubscribe by emailing
>>> discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>

--------
You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org