Discuss mailing list

[Alejandro Bonet <albogoal AT gmail.com>]

Im waiting for Frank.

I need to know if the data is useful for his pourpose or it is only "true 
shit".

I think he would must to explain more about this issue in technical terms,
and with some links to understand "The menace" he is fighting...

Alejandro Bonet
albogoal AT gmail.com

PD: I'm not the enemy of anybody.

I allways try to help if i can, but it seems many times i get the otherwise...


2014-03-05 18:15 GMT+01:00, Alejandro Bonet <albogoal AT gmail.com>:
> Jeff: An accusation needs an accusated.
>
> Who is that?...
>
> All the email list?...
>
> Im sure my english is not the best.
>
> If someone has been offended by my bad english, i ask for excuses to all
> them.
>
> Perhaps im unfriendly for many people here.
> But, please, dont look to my form.
> Look to my bottom.
>
> Alejandro Bonet
> albogoal AT gmail.com
>
>
> 2014-03-05 18:08 GMT+01:00, Alejandro Bonet <albogoal AT gmail.com>:
>> Yes Guillaume: I almost agree with you:
>>
>> "Domain names are public. The list of every domain queried on a
>> particular server is not."
>>
>> But i dont said which server.
>> Also i dont said it was the entire list of every domain queried to
>> that unknow server.
>>
>> OK?
>>
>> Please: If you dont like the proposal of Frank (to ask us about public
>> domain names to get
>> the hashes and, perhaps, fight against some program invented by
>> someones to censor the internet trought DNS, or decipher it to
>> contribute to a better free internet, or to denunce publicly the
>> someones trying to censor), please say it to Frank.
>>
>> I understand the Frank question.
>> I answer it as i can.
>> I dont know his motivations, but they seem honest.
>>
>> As it seems, Frank does not follow this list with the same frequency
>> as you or me.
>>
>> There are lots of web accesible listings of domain names.
>>
>> Thats all.
>>
>> Alejandro Bonet
>> albogoal AT gmail.com
>>
>> PD: Nova King, i dont understand why you are offended by my suggestion
>> that "perhaps some bad guys are listen this email list"...
>>
>> It is only "a theory"...
>>
>> If true, no matter with you or me... We can do anything to avoid that.
>>
>> And Guillaume has again another reason: It is completely baseless.
>>
>> But also it is completely baseless to mantain in absolut terms that
>> "all the subscriptors are proved good guys"...
>>
>> I think that most of them are good guys, in fact im sure of that...
>> But perhaps not all.
>>
>> And i think we need to remember that allways...
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 2014-03-05 17:47 GMT+01:00, Guillaume Parent <gparent AT gparent.org>:
>>> The list of domains queried on a DNS server is not public until the
>>> operator of that DNS server makes it public. Stop implying otherwise,
>>> because it is factually wrong.
>>>
>>> Domain names are public. The list of every domain queried on a
>>> particular
>>> server is not.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 4:41 PM, Alejandro Bonet <albogoal AT gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I dont know if the word shit (you likes it so much) have the mean i
>>>> think...
>>>>
>>>> I dont "acusse the list" at all, as you say.
>>>>
>>>> I only say maybe there are some bad guys listen it.
>>>>
>>>> The data is public or PUBLIC (if you dont like caps, it's your
>>>> problem).
>>>>
>>>> The data is collected from google, which is public, and dns queries
>>>> trasversing all the internet
>>>> in clear. Frank says he has collected amounts of these data from other
>>>> public sources.
>>>>
>>>> To post these data into this semipublic list for subscriptors dont
>>>> make "more public" the
>>>> data.
>>>>
>>>> Alejandro Bonet
>>>> albogoal AT gmail.com
>>>>
>>>> PD: But you have reason in one thing: It was bad idea to post the
>>>> data...
>>>>
>>>> Because perhaps now, i cant stop your SHIT verborrea!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --------
>>>> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
>>>> You may unsubscribe by emailing
>>>> discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>