Discuss mailing list

[Wil <wil AT lesspheres.fr>]

Hi all,

I'm new here ; so please, don't take offence on anything I might say that's sounds completely idiot..

"...this TLD does belong to Tim and he has submitted relative documentations to ICANN including his .ing trademark..."
Well, i would like to be sure to understand ; could you tell what kind of documents has been submitted exactly please ?

I don't know how many people use OpenNic servers by now.. But if the plan is to serve any people, including my grandma, maybe, with ICANN's total stupid behaviour, we should try to make people understand that we (all people using internet) should not leave an "important part" of the control of Internet in corporation's hands. 

Maybe, yes, we could ask the E.F.F an hand on this. 

The question might be stupid, but does OpenNic has a blog or any site with info news somewhere ?

I guess that some people on the list do have a blog or something similar.. Is this a good idea to start to talk about this ? 

Don't worry, I'm not an utopist either, but maybe the more people hear about this, the more they might get interest in this kind of problem...

Wil. 

Le 5 mars 2014 à 16:40, Peter Green <peter AT greenpete.free> a écrit :

.ing has signed the contract[0] with ICANN.

Just to clarify, do you not mean ' Charleston Road Registry Inc has signed A contract with I.C.A.N.N?

we now have our first conflicting domain within this money grab ICANN has started.

This is pants... :-/

our choices are; - keep .ing in the OpenNIC root and conflict with ICANN

Yes. (I will vote come the time).

As Dan Q, said, can we get help from the E.F.F?

Peter
--
Wanged from my Kaiser by a mischievous pixie!


--------
You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org