discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
Subject: Discuss mailing list
List archive
- From: Alejandro Bonet <albogoal AT gmail.com>
- To: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
- Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] [ICANN] New gTLDS, first conflict
- Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2014 14:27:15 +0100
Wow Coyo!!
I had no idea about BGP, AS, etc... Now i see...
Respecting TLDs i (and some friends) proposse a "simple general rule
anybody could agree":
"If you run a public dns server resolving ALL namespaces to The People,
then you can create SOME namespaces and they will be respected by The People".
How many namespaces? In my humble personal opinion ONE for each public
dns server you suply...
Its a way "to pay" the service of public dns servers, and a way to avoid
big money or dictionary based abuses we are suffering today.
And it does not need a "central authority", or complex votations: Only
"observatories taking PUBLIC account of tld namespaces and public dns
servers".
Anybody can create his own "observatory" and collect and publish
public data about tlds and dns servers...
Luckily there are sixtillions of names that can be used as tlds, and perhaps
no many people want to create tlds if they need to mantain a public
dns servers...
About coins, we (me and some others) are promoting the ibu: sindeuda.org
A virtual currency created not as debt against the bank,
instead it is created as Universal Basic Income, at a personal
rate equivalent to monthly world GDP percapita.
It is not a "coin" for new tld rights: It is a currency for all trades.
...
Perhaps you and me dont have the same idea about capitalism.
Or perhaps we dont distingish it well from liberalism.
As i see it (and it is the way Carlos Marx defined it), capitalism is a
natural degeneration of liberalism.
It is not an "economic theoretical model". It is the contrary: A
disease of liberalism
which is the "real" economic theoretical model behind capitalism disease.
Carlos Marx only showed us liberalism contradiction:
"If you let people trade without limits, to get many offers in the
market, you will get few
concentrated offers in the market, and some few people will control
ALL the market and
in the name of free market."
It is the same idea behind Monopoly board game...
This game allways ends in the same way: A player has the complete
board, and the rest
of players have nothing...
Of course i respect all the freedom for write and sign agreements
between any parts.
But if these agreements invade "public" (dont confuse with
"governamental") space,
then i think The People must say whatever they want about that
"private" agreements.
Including the right to DENY them, or simply "ignore them".
Capitalism is the contrary of Democracy.
But of course, capitalism try to manage and administer Democracy,
because this is
its worse enemy...
Best regards and thanks for your explanations, Coyo, about ip routing
oligopolies...
Alejandro Bonet
albogoal AT gmail.com
PD: This is another (one more) war i had no idea, but i will follow it
in the future...
- Re: [opennic-discuss] [ICANN] New gTLDS, first conflict, (continued)
- Re: [opennic-discuss] [ICANN] New gTLDS, first conflict, Calum McAlinden, 03/12/2014
- Re: [opennic-discuss] [ICANN] New gTLDS, first conflict, Quinn Wood, 03/12/2014
- [opennic-discuss] Meetings, Peter Green, 03/12/2014
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Meetings, Quinn Wood, 03/12/2014
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Meetings, Peter Green, 03/12/2014
- Re: [opennic-discuss] [ICANN] New gTLDS, first conflict, Richard Lyons, 03/13/2014
- Re: [opennic-discuss] [ICANN] New gTLDS, first conflict, Wil, 03/05/2014
- Re: [opennic-discuss] [ICANN] New gTLDS, first conflict, Alejandro Bonet, 03/05/2014
- Re: [opennic-discuss] [ICANN] New gTLDS, first conflict, Coyo, 03/05/2014
- Re: [opennic-discuss] [ICANN] New gTLDS, first conflict, Alejandro Bonet, 03/06/2014
- Re: [opennic-discuss] [ICANN] New gTLDS, first conflict, Alejandro Bonet, 03/06/2014
- Re: [opennic-discuss] [ICANN] New gTLDS, first conflict, Alejandro Bonet, 03/06/2014
- Re: [opennic-discuss] [ICANN] New gTLDS, first conflict, Coyo, 03/06/2014
- Re: [opennic-discuss] [ICANN] New gTLDS, first conflict, Coyo, 03/06/2014
- Re: [opennic-discuss] [ICANN] New gTLDS, first conflict, Wil, 03/11/2014
- Re: [opennic-discuss] [ICANN] New gTLDS, first conflict, Coyo, 03/11/2014
- Re: [opennic-discuss] [ICANN] New gTLDS, first conflict, Wil, 03/11/2014
- Re: [opennic-discuss] [ICANN] New gTLDS, first conflict, Peter Green, 03/11/2014
- Re: [opennic-discuss] [ICANN] New gTLDS, first conflict, Wil, 03/11/2014
- Re: [opennic-discuss] [ICANN] New gTLDS, first conflict, Peter Green, 03/11/2014
- Re: [opennic-discuss] [ICANN] New gTLDS, first conflict, Alejandro Bonet, 03/06/2014
- Re: [opennic-discuss] [ICANN] New gTLDS, first conflict, Alejandro Bonet, 03/06/2014
- Re: [opennic-discuss] [ICANN] New gTLDS, first conflict, Coyo, 03/05/2014
- Re: [opennic-discuss] [ICANN] New gTLDS, first conflict, Alejandro Bonet, 03/05/2014
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.