discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
Subject: Discuss mailing list
List archive
- From: Richard Lyons <richard AT the-place.net>
- To: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
- Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] [ICANN] New gTLDS, first conflict
- Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 09:15:54 +0000
- Comment: DKIM? See http://www.dkim.org
- Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=the-place.net; h=Received:Received:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:User-Agent; b=LegFM0v0DWemHUBCQJMIGjOPFkkLpKQmPTOwOMkD/BNr8I7FUYKs+w9KixOlS8 NxcsmJJ3P0E8ZZSnfPeOfAQgg0P5oAYsbz5poe+bn3vIKx2FZTd8Uo9rLPGUJHQX Q7fnfPbdJdm/dwBC8ov9dL0Eai27RIGCS+juBuu6WjlmM=;
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 16:07:32 -0400, Jon Hebb wrote:
> I know this may not be received well, but possibly an idea would be to
> migrate this and future gTLD's to something like .ing.alt or .ing-alt
Just a thought: What if we had a policy to always accept .abc- as well
as .abc for any OpenNIC tld? It is very unlikely the .xyz- version
would be adopted under ICANN. It is identifiable and adds only one
character. And in the event of a future conflict caused by ICANN
stealing a tld, we could resolve the - version in perpetuity.
Gradually, people could migrate to it being the preferred version and
ultimately perhaps drop the .pqr type.
You could argue for .-foo or .-wow- instead. We would have to choose a
single standard.
It would have the secondary advantage of being a little PR tool in its
own right. In time, you might imagine even adopting it into a graphic
identity "open.-nic-" or, neater ".open-", or whatever.
I'm no expert, but the hyphen is the only non alpanumeric character which
conforms to RFC 3696, and though RFC1035 preferred name syntax does not
like the hyphen to appear at the end, I assume it would be accepted by
most or all programs that handle domain names. I am sure someone here
knows why this would not work.
richard
- Re: [opennic-discuss] [ICANN] New gTLDS, first conflict, (continued)
- Re: [opennic-discuss] [ICANN] New gTLDS, first conflict, Coyo, 03/12/2014
- Re: [opennic-discuss] [ICANN] New gTLDS, first conflict, Jon Hebb, 03/12/2014
- Re: [opennic-discuss] [ICANN] New gTLDS, first conflict, Peter Green, 03/12/2014
- Re: [opennic-discuss] [ICANN] New gTLDS, first conflict, Jeff Taylor, 03/12/2014
- Re: [opennic-discuss] [ICANN] New gTLDS, first conflict, Peter Green, 03/12/2014
- Re: [opennic-discuss] [ICANN] New gTLDS, first conflict, Calum McAlinden, 03/12/2014
- Re: [opennic-discuss] [ICANN] New gTLDS, first conflict, Quinn Wood, 03/12/2014
- [opennic-discuss] Meetings, Peter Green, 03/12/2014
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Meetings, Quinn Wood, 03/12/2014
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Meetings, Peter Green, 03/12/2014
- Re: [opennic-discuss] [ICANN] New gTLDS, first conflict, Richard Lyons, 03/13/2014
- Re: [opennic-discuss] [ICANN] New gTLDS, first conflict, Wil, 03/05/2014
- Re: [opennic-discuss] [ICANN] New gTLDS, first conflict, Alejandro Bonet, 03/05/2014
- Re: [opennic-discuss] [ICANN] New gTLDS, first conflict, Coyo, 03/05/2014
- Re: [opennic-discuss] [ICANN] New gTLDS, first conflict, Alejandro Bonet, 03/06/2014
- Re: [opennic-discuss] [ICANN] New gTLDS, first conflict, Alejandro Bonet, 03/06/2014
- Re: [opennic-discuss] [ICANN] New gTLDS, first conflict, Alejandro Bonet, 03/06/2014
- Re: [opennic-discuss] [ICANN] New gTLDS, first conflict, Coyo, 03/06/2014
- Re: [opennic-discuss] [ICANN] New gTLDS, first conflict, Coyo, 03/06/2014
- Re: [opennic-discuss] [ICANN] New gTLDS, first conflict, Wil, 03/11/2014
- Re: [opennic-discuss] [ICANN] New gTLDS, first conflict, Alejandro Bonet, 03/06/2014
- Re: [opennic-discuss] [ICANN] New gTLDS, first conflict, Alejandro Bonet, 03/06/2014
- Re: [opennic-discuss] [ICANN] New gTLDS, first conflict, Coyo, 03/05/2014
- Re: [opennic-discuss] [ICANN] New gTLDS, first conflict, Alejandro Bonet, 03/05/2014
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.