discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
Subject: Discuss mailing list
List archive
- From: vv AT cgs.pw
- To: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
- Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] [VOTE] .chan Proposal
- Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 05:37:10 -0700
- Importance: Normal
According to the e-mail from @Julian De Marchi (Wed, October 14, 2015
2:21 am) it would appear that the voting procedure is actually radically
different from that. Julian explains there that it is now required that
one sign up to an additional account with one's real name. Having joined
the mailing list does not make one eligible to vote.
~ vv
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA256
>
> You're eligible to vote since you've joined the mailing list, actually.
>
> I don't think there's too much concern here. Many anons are actively
> online even during the holidays, and with the prolific nature of
> mobile devices it would be difficult to find ourselves in a situation
> where most people had zero access to the Internet. Especially in
> regards to a vote, which would be a simple Yay or Nay at the minimum
> response.
>
> On 10/13/2015 07:11 PM, Alessandro Pezzoni wrote:
>> I am very new to the OpenNIC community, so I will abstain from
>> voting (actually, I don't even know if I would be eligible to
>> vote).
>>
>> I do have a question regarding the charter, though: isn't 96 hours
>> (48 for discussion plus 48 for voting) a bit too short of a
>> timeframe to present all kinds of proposals, especially given that
>> the outcome a vote is to be decided by simple majority of the votes
>> cast (i.e. with no quorum required)? For example, wouldn't this
>> make it easier for a small group to pass a controversial proposal,
>> e.g. by presenting it during a holiday break?
>>
>> Best wishes, AP
>>
>> On Tue, 13 Oct 2015 14:41:05 -0400, gitgud <gitgud AT tfwno.gf>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Well, after having some excellent and constructive conversations
>> in the IRC with you all, I'm ready to push our proposal forward to
>> a vote on the floor of the OpenNIC governing organization. The
>> proposal we make, should it pass, establishes the following:
>>
>> 1. .chan becomes an official OpenNIC TLD 2. Our charter becomes the
>> governing document of our organization
>> (http://chandns.net/Charter) 3. .chan's T1 server is approved and
>> whitelisted
>>
>> If you'd like more information about our organization, feel free
>> to visit our website at http://chandns.net or to join us in IRC at
>> #.chan on freenode (http://webchat.freenode.net?channels=%23.chan).
>> Attached also is my public key, which I will use to sign and when
>> needed encrypt further communications to the mailing list and with
>> others.
>>
>> This email also casts my vote in the affirmative for this
>> proposal, whether that be "Yes" or "Yay".
>>>
>>>
>>> -------- You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. You may
>>> unsubscribe by emailing
>>> discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -------- You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. You may
>> unsubscribe by emailing
>> discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
>>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v2
>
> iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJWHZmVAAoJEA0IbcbHfV6twPIH+wZMKFFIbdNZJGiY0BGgkORd
> 5a4GWe76AfRlr0IERBG7UCRbHwppb/l1BFYchKvSUTgmCdrohQuYMXX5j7Eso7XP
> lxZtaEnG7pMLpl9fIYybqbwoKfnA0UsgN8hE4Rjn1i6STvx8QyHX2JZ2fRwFgKu7
> DZxolzMw9iGUiOr5tSvHhnQ2iGlk6KLi1cOGwzNVeefnEwnqz7s6nszd1lmT1gzi
> Aith7YPuQKE3hKXioRw4CC52DFijjUQxbDnarB3gn1B3rZsEIV2LyMBosgVxGKTd
> e0M6VEXURr5mn98Hf9kJ7rheCVj4xC3kAqGJB0ZfB6s1JwRrIeLaGO5SQHOCDiM=
> =y05p
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
> --------
> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
> You may unsubscribe by emailing
> discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
>
- Re: [opennic-discuss] [VOTE] .chan Proposal, (continued)
- Re: [opennic-discuss] [VOTE] .chan Proposal, krosos, 10/13/2015
- Re: [opennic-discuss] [VOTE] .chan Proposal, Niles Rogoff, 10/13/2015
- Re: [opennic-discuss] [VOTE] .chan Proposal, me, 10/13/2015
- [opennic-discuss] Res: [VOTE] .chan Proposal, Danton Medrado, 10/13/2015
- Re: [opennic-discuss] [VOTE] .chan Proposal, Verax, 10/13/2015
- Re: [opennic-discuss] [VOTE] .chan Proposal, Andrew T. Stager, 10/13/2015
- Re: [opennic-discuss] [VOTE] .chan Proposal, Bart Smienk, 10/13/2015
- Re: [opennic-discuss] [VOTE] .chan Proposal, Alessandro Pezzoni, 10/13/2015
- Re: [opennic-discuss] [VOTE] .chan Proposal, gitgud, 10/13/2015
- Re: [opennic-discuss] [VOTE] .chan Proposal, Paginas Web y Servidores :: Ventas, 10/13/2015
- Re: [opennic-discuss] [VOTE] .chan Proposal, vv, 10/16/2015
- Re: [opennic-discuss] [VOTE] .chan Proposal, gitgud, 10/13/2015
- Re: [opennic-discuss] [VOTE] .chan Proposal, Administrador, 10/13/2015
- Re: [opennic-discuss] [VOTE] .chan Proposal, Jerry Pipes, 10/13/2015
- Re: [opennic-discuss] [VOTE] .chan Proposal, vv, 10/14/2015
- Re: [opennic-discuss] [VOTE] .chan Proposal, Jacob Bachmeyer, 10/14/2015
- Re: [opennic-discuss] [VOTE] .chan Proposal, Hunter 9999, 10/14/2015
- Re: [opennic-discuss] [VOTE] .chan Proposal, Philipp Schafft, 10/14/2015
- RE: [opennic-discuss] [VOTE] .chan Proposal, Paginas Web y Servidores, 10/15/2015
- Re: [opennic-discuss] [VOTE] .chan Proposal, krosos, 10/13/2015
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.