Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

discuss - RE: [opennic-discuss] .core peering instead of TLD?

discuss AT

Subject: Discuss mailing list

List archive

RE: [opennic-discuss] .core peering instead of TLD?

Chronological Thread 
  • From: Joseph Marsden <josephmarsden AT>
  • To: "discuss AT" <discuss AT>
  • Subject: RE: [opennic-discuss] .core peering instead of TLD?
  • Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2017 18:34:21 +0000
  • Accept-language: en-GB, en-US
  • Authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=josephmarsden AT;
  • Spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
  • Spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99

What exactly are you suspicious about? I'm happy to answer any questions
you'd like.

-----Original Message-----
From: discuss-request AT
[mailto:discuss-request AT] On Behalf Of Daniel
Sent: 19 February 2017 6:32 PM
To: discuss <discuss AT>
Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] .core peering instead of TLD?

I'd still vote No. Someone who has his resources should at least contribute
an OpenNIC DNS server and leave it up for a few months before even thinking
of proposing peering a new TLD. I'm still suspicious about this guy, and
"someone told me the IRC room was dead" was the smoking gun for me.


-Dan Q

On Sun, 19 Feb 2017 13:19:28 +0000, Joseph Marsden
<josephmarsden AT> wrote:

> Hi all,
> I've had feedback from a few people that the .core TLD would be better off
> as its own alternative root zone (CoreNIC) peered with OpenNIC.
> What would everyone think of this arrangement? At this stage I'd just like
> to get a few opinions, we're not certain about anything yet.
> --------
> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
> You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page