Discuss mailing list

[Jonah Aragon <jonaharagon AT gmail.com>]

Just thought it was odd you were complaining about not knowing enough about him while replying to an email he sent asking you for any questions you might've had about him. But yes, perhaps we need actions over words in this scenario.

Jonah

On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 2:28 PM kevin <krattai AT gmail.com> wrote:

Yes.  Very aware of the language I used in the email.

Kevin

On Sun, 2017-02-19 at 20:17 +0000, Jonah Aragon wrote:
> You ARE aware you wrote that in reply to Joseph, the applicant,
> correct?
>
>
> Jonah
>
> On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 2:15 PM kevin <krattai AT gmail.com> wrote:
>
>         I'm not entirely certain answers are going to resolve the
>         trust concern
>         at this moment.  Of course, I can't talk for anyone but me.
>         This is
>         outside of any relationship concerns.  Joseph is the
>         applicant.  We want
>         to know about Joseph and his goals and motivations and beliefs
>         or
>         understandings of open communities.  Testimonials from others
>         do not let
>         us know about Joseph.
>
>         I suspect that participation within the community with a
>         certain amount
>         of transparency (created through general conversation and
>         participation)
>         will help.  Going on IRC and getting to know the membership
>         that is
>         active there will help, as well.
>
>         Just thoughts.
>
>         Kevin
>
>         On Sun, 2017-02-19 at 18:34 +0000, Joseph Marsden wrote:
>         > What exactly are you suspicious about? I'm happy to answer
>         any questions you'd like.
>         >
>         > -----Original Message-----
>         > From: discuss-request AT lists.opennicproject.org
>         [mailto:discuss-request AT lists.opennicproject.org] On Behalf Of
>         Daniel Quintiliani
>         > Sent: 19 February 2017 6:32 PM
>         > To: discuss <discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org>
>         > Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] .core peering instead of TLD?
>         >
>         > I'd still vote No. Someone who has his resources should at
>         least contribute an OpenNIC DNS server and leave it up for a
>         few months before even thinking of proposing peering a new
>         TLD. I'm still suspicious about this guy, and "someone told me
>         the IRC room was dead" was the smoking gun for me.
>         >
>         > --
>         >
>         > -Dan Q
>         >
>         > On Sun, 19 Feb 2017 13:19:28 +0000, Joseph Marsden
>         <josephmarsden AT towerdevs.xyz> wrote:
>         >
>         > > Hi all,
>         > > I've had feedback from a few people that the .core TLD
>         would be better off as its own alternative root zone (CoreNIC)
>         peered with OpenNIC.
>         > > What would everyone think of this arrangement? At this
>         stage I'd just like to get a few opinions, we're not certain
>         about anything yet.
>         > >
>         > >
>         > > --------
>         > > You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
>         > > You may unsubscribe by emailing
>         discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         > --------
>         > You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
>         > You may unsubscribe by emailing
>         discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
>
>
>
>
>         --------
>         You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
>         You may unsubscribe by emailing
>         discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
>
> --------
> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
> You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org




--------
You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org