Discuss mailing list

[<vv AT cgs.pw>]

I've had a long chat with Joseph on IRC some weeks back,
I guess you missed that. I think it is time that is
the issue for some people here. It takes a while before
everybody has had a chance to interact.

~ Ole


On Sun, 19 Feb 2017 14:14:05 -0600
kevin <krattai AT gmail.com> wrote:

> I'm not entirely certain answers are going to resolve the
> trust concern at this moment.  Of course, I can't talk
> for anyone but me.  This is outside of any relationship
> concerns.  Joseph is the applicant.  We want to know
> about Joseph and his goals and motivations and beliefs or
> understandings of open communities.  Testimonials from
> others do not let us know about Joseph.
> 
> I suspect that participation within the community with a
> certain amount of transparency (created through general
> conversation and participation) will help.  Going on IRC
> and getting to know the membership that is active there
> will help, as well.
> 
> Just thoughts.
> 
> Kevin
> 
> On Sun, 2017-02-19 at 18:34 +0000, Joseph Marsden wrote:
> > What exactly are you suspicious about? I'm happy to
> > answer any questions you'd like.
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: discuss-request AT lists.opennicproject.org
> > [mailto:discuss-request AT lists.opennicproject.org] On
> > Behalf Of Daniel Quintiliani Sent: 19 February 2017
> > 6:32 PM To: discuss <discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org>
> > Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] .core peering instead of
> > TLD?
> > 
> > I'd still vote No. Someone who has his resources should
> > at least contribute an OpenNIC DNS server and leave it
> > up for a few months before even thinking of proposing
> > peering a new TLD. I'm still suspicious about this guy,
> > and "someone told me the IRC room was dead" was the
> > smoking gun for me.
> > 
> > --
> > 
> > -Dan Q
> > 
> > On Sun, 19 Feb 2017 13:19:28 +0000, Joseph Marsden
> > <josephmarsden AT towerdevs.xyz> wrote: 
> > > Hi all,
> > > I've had feedback from a few people that the .core
> > > TLD would be better off as its own alternative root
> > > zone (CoreNIC) peered with OpenNIC. What would
> > > everyone think of this arrangement? At this stage I'd
> > > just like to get a few opinions, we're not certain
> > > about anything yet.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > --------
> > > You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. 
> > > You may unsubscribe by emailing
> > > discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org  
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > --------
> > You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. 
> > You may unsubscribe by emailing
> > discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org  
> 
>