Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

discuss - Re: [opennic-discuss] OpenNIC

discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org

Subject: Discuss mailing list

List archive

Re: [opennic-discuss] OpenNIC


Chronological Thread 
  • From: kevin <krattai AT gmail.com>
  • To: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
  • Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] OpenNIC
  • Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2017 14:33:02 -0600

From a service provider and organizational perspective, it's certainly
all about user adoption.  From a user perspective, it's quite likely
all about ease of use.

I looked for an alternative because it is what I wanted for personal
use as well as for my project.  OpenNIC is easy enough for someone with
a bit of tech savvy, but not necessarily for the average person.

I'm sure that for your purposes, this is something you already
understand, but I'm putting this out there as a reminder for everyone
that just because it's built, doesn't mean people will flock to it.  My
project integrates OpenNIC peering, so the user need do nothing.

With that said, for your own use, it's easy enough and go for it.  If
you are going to want to attract a large user base, then there has to
be either very simple instructions for someone motivated enough to
change their DNS settings in the computer, or there _should_ be some
volunteer based support system in place which is user friendly, to
support people to migrate and in a way that has appropriate cost
benefit.

I run two unique public DNS servers, so my customers use those, which
gives access to OpenNIC domains.  That means that I generally have to
set those customers up myself, and it's only fair to offload the DNS to
my servers, rather that overloading a peer on OpenNIC directly.

I would say that from a grass roots perspective, the best results
towards adoption would be to promote to network admins and secondary
(W)ISPs.

Otherwise, I'm sure that help with docs, docs, and more docs and then
pointing people to the resources with appropriate valuation depending
on market demographics will be the way to continue growth directly from
the end user.

Hope some of that helps or is informative.

Cheers,

Kevin

On Thu, 2017-12-14 at 14:27 -0500, Alex Nuta wrote:
> Good to hear from you, Kevin.
>
> What I need most is to get up to speed and find out what is needed
> most, and what I can contribute to the project.
> Obviously it goes without saying that I can run a few servers, as a
> volunteer. I also think I can help get the word out to spur adoption,
> especially now, as people are hearing more and more about internet
> censorship, block lists and repeal of Net Neutrality. 
> The time is right to communicate on this project.
>
> For example, I could add a Tier 1 or Tier 2 server in the datacenter
> ( I lease from OVH situated in Beauharnois, QC they have great
> connectivity.) , I have a dedicated line with fixed IPs for my home
> office, where I can put another server, although on a more modest
> 60Mbps symmetric connection that drops once or twice a year.
>
> I'm not sure what's needed most at this junction. 
> I appreciate any pointers on maximizing my contribution.
>
> Alex Nuta
> alex.nuta AT protonmail.com
>
> Sent from ProtonMail, encrypted email based in Switzerland. Join for
> free and get highly secure email.
>
>
> > -------- Original Message --------
> > Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] OpenNIC
> > Local Time: December 14, 2017 2:17 PM
> > UTC Time: December 14, 2017 7:17 PM
> > From: krattai AT gmail.com
> > To: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
> >
> > Greetz from another canuck, Alex.
> >
> > I've been actively using OpenNIC since jan 2015 for similar reasons
> > and
> > via a similar path it seems.
> >
> > I'm not opposed to joining efforts as I've been working on a
> > unique,
> > p2p / distributed DNS for one of my projects, as well, using
> > OpenNIC as
> > a T2 for that.
> >
> > At this time, I recommend OpenNIC as certainly one of the best
> > alternatives out there.  I just don't like all my eggs in one
> > basket,
> > especially if a project like this were to become just another rules
> > and
> > regulations heavy, restrictive org.
> >
> > Personally, I remain committed to finding or building a publicly
> > valuable and easily usable open, user managed, peer oriented, self
> > healing and perpetuating infrastructure.  I'm always interested in
> > discussing further.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Kevin
> >
> > On Thu, 2017-12-14 at 10:29 -0500, Alex Nuta wrote:
> > Greetings from Canada.
> > I found this project because, before creating it myself, I wanted
> > to
> > see if someone had beat me to it. Well done.
> > I decided to do this myself following the news that several top
> > telecommunications corporations in Canada are planning to create a
> > blocking list with no oversight or supervision controlled by three
> > major players in the telecommunication and content production
> > market.  They are currently lobbying government to discuss the
> > matter
> > in secret talks as part of international treaties. Yes, we've seen
> > this before. Yes, they're at it again.
> > I have no doubt that sooner or later, one of these initiatives will
> > pass in the US or Canada, and soon.
> > Ostensibly these measures are intended to curb copyright
> > infringement, but behind it, it's fairly clear, is to create an
> > uneven playing field in the content providing business heavily
> > stacked in favour of the companies controlling the block list, and
> > turn the Internet into Cable TV all over again.
> > And, in my opinion, it won't stop there. The Quebec provincial
> > government has already asked that all gambling sites be blocked
> > province-wide, putting up a fence, in effect, since it has a local
> > monopoly on gambling through its commercial Loto-Quebec venture,
> > next
> > will likely be alcohol sales, since the Quebec government assumed a
> > monopoly on alcohol sales province-wide, and I can easily see
> > governments labelling dissidents and other social activists with
> > some
> > kind of terminology which gets them on the block list to silence
> > dissent.
> > Together the top three corporations involved control 50% of the ISP
> > market in Canada.
> > In this context, OpenNIC becomes a potential solution, and I intend
> > to publicize it to my social media audience (mainly nerds, systems
> > administrators, networking specialists and social activists.) 
> > I would be interested in any available less technical information,
> > infographics, or similar materials to educate the non-technical
> > among
> > the group to stimulate end-user adoption. I'll make my own if
> > nothing
> > like this is available.
> > I will also set up a few servers ASAP, after reviewing the
> > documentation, one located at my office, one in my home office and
> > another in my data centre.
> > Also, I work in marketing, and if I can lend assistance in that
> > department to get the word out, please let me know.
> > Thanks in advance.
> > Alex Nuta
> > alex.nuta AT protonmail.com
> > Sent from ProtonMail, encrypted email based in Switzerland. Join
> > for
> > free and get highly secure email.
> >
> > You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. 
> > You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicpr
> > oj
> > ect.org
> > --
> > http://ca.linkedin.com/in/kevinrattai/
> >
> >
> >
> > https://plus.google.com/+KevinRattai/
> >
> >
> >
> > https://community.spiceworks.com/people/kevinrattai
> >
> >
> >
> > You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
> > You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicpr
> > oject.org
>
> --------
> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. 
> You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproj
> ect.org
--
http://ca.linkedin.com/in/kevinrattai/



https://plus.google.com/+KevinRattai/



https://community.spiceworks.com/people/kevinrattai




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page