discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
Subject: Discuss mailing list
List archive
- From: mike <mike AT pikeaero.com>
- To: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
- Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] [VOTE] vote for .box
- Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2011 11:45:40 -0400
- Envelope-to: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
- List-archive: <http://lists.darkdna.net/pipermail/discuss>
- List-id: <discuss.lists.opennicproject.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 11-08-16 10:41 AM, mike wrote:
[clip]
> Prohibited contents and behavior
[/clip]
I guess in the larger picture, I have to ask myself, where does the
responsibility for content censorship rest? If you where to ask me, I
would answer that it rests primarily with the observer, it's just common
sense, if it offends you, then don't look at it.
However I don't want to digress into a whole philosophical discussion on
content censorship, but simply put, I'm not entirely convinced that the
NIC is the right place to be attempting to enforce content censorship in
the first place.
- --Mike
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJOSpCeAAoJEEzVYN3s3Af7gZoIAIHuyT0V3AorLa01GC3g0G7l
0C86bwdf8ESj66hl/ImD0zAVwnqp9l7xHbQZAJaVZbVhxmseU0vZFX5hQX81ZIMA
AMMr5cKNGN94IXdh4OzZW+tohNPhukPoCBTZ0/NqVfBBdSUxKa2qa1SyMg449vBq
bkoeL7n0XBMvXkVpjqMg3/npX6CGVSXQKMkQd8+i6g/wBqgJcpuKgF91un0wblAw
C0/87q7M63aV5/KlrV30/ZlTKmnBfboD4C5diCVQL/QqdfARc8zXaNCXxRxmK5+a
tn81o3hMlCh8uEBTrbr3pX0U74I3G/yy/0sboN5v/H+GAz14fEnwgVKx5ArQG64=
=k2p1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- [opennic-discuss] [VOTE] vote for .box, julian, 08/15/2011
- Re: [opennic-discuss] [VOTE] vote for .box, Travis McCrea, 08/15/2011
- Re: [opennic-discuss] [VOTE] vote for .box, Dominique Rehborn, 08/15/2011
- Re: [opennic-discuss] [VOTE] vote for .box, Alex Nordlund, 08/16/2011
- Re: [opennic-discuss] [VOTE] vote for .box, Dominique Rehborn, 08/16/2011
- Re: [opennic-discuss] [VOTE] vote for .box, Alex Nordlund, 08/16/2011
- Re: [opennic-discuss] [VOTE] vote for .box, Dominique Rehborn, 08/16/2011
- Re: [opennic-discuss] [VOTE] vote for .box, mike, 08/16/2011
- Re: [opennic-discuss] [VOTE] vote for .box, mike, 08/16/2011
- Re: [opennic-discuss] [VOTE] vote for .box, Dominique Rehborn, 08/16/2011
- Re: [opennic-discuss] [VOTE] vote for .box, mike, 08/16/2011
- Re: [opennic-discuss] [VOTE] vote for .box, Amrit Panesar, 08/16/2011
- Re: [opennic-discuss] [VOTE] vote for .box, mike, 08/16/2011
- Re: [opennic-discuss] [VOTE] vote for .box, Alex Nordlund, 08/16/2011
- Re: [opennic-discuss] [VOTE] vote for .box, Dominique Rehborn, 08/16/2011
- Re: [opennic-discuss] [VOTE] vote for .box, Alex Nordlund, 08/16/2011
- Re: [opennic-discuss] [VOTE] vote for .box, Dominique Rehborn, 08/16/2011
- Re: [opennic-discuss] [VOTE] vote for .box, Alex Nordlund, 08/16/2011
- Re: [opennic-discuss] [VOTE] vote for .box, Dominique Rehborn, 08/15/2011
- Re: [opennic-discuss] [VOTE] vote for .box, Travis McCrea, 08/15/2011
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [opennic-discuss] [VOTE] vote for .box, me, 08/16/2011
- Re: [opennic-discuss] [VOTE] vote for .box, Alex Nordlund, 08/16/2011
- Re: [opennic-discuss] [VOTE] vote for .box, Amrit Panesar, 08/16/2011
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.