Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

discuss - Re: [opennic-discuss] [VOTE] vote for .box

discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org

Subject: Discuss mailing list

List archive

Re: [opennic-discuss] [VOTE] vote for .box


Chronological Thread 
  • From: mike <mike AT pikeaero.com>
  • To: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
  • Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] [VOTE] vote for .box
  • Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2011 11:45:40 -0400
  • Envelope-to: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
  • List-archive: <http://lists.darkdna.net/pipermail/discuss>
  • List-id: <discuss.lists.opennicproject.org>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 11-08-16 10:41 AM, mike wrote:
[clip]
> Prohibited contents and behavior
[/clip]

I guess in the larger picture, I have to ask myself, where does the
responsibility for content censorship rest? If you where to ask me, I
would answer that it rests primarily with the observer, it's just common
sense, if it offends you, then don't look at it.

However I don't want to digress into a whole philosophical discussion on
content censorship, but simply put, I'm not entirely convinced that the
NIC is the right place to be attempting to enforce content censorship in
the first place.

- --Mike
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJOSpCeAAoJEEzVYN3s3Af7gZoIAIHuyT0V3AorLa01GC3g0G7l
0C86bwdf8ESj66hl/ImD0zAVwnqp9l7xHbQZAJaVZbVhxmseU0vZFX5hQX81ZIMA
AMMr5cKNGN94IXdh4OzZW+tohNPhukPoCBTZ0/NqVfBBdSUxKa2qa1SyMg449vBq
bkoeL7n0XBMvXkVpjqMg3/npX6CGVSXQKMkQd8+i6g/wBqgJcpuKgF91un0wblAw
C0/87q7M63aV5/KlrV30/ZlTKmnBfboD4C5diCVQL/QqdfARc8zXaNCXxRxmK5+a
tn81o3hMlCh8uEBTrbr3pX0U74I3G/yy/0sboN5v/H+GAz14fEnwgVKx5ArQG64=
=k2p1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page