Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

discuss - Re: [opennic-discuss] [VOTE] vote for .box

discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org

Subject: Discuss mailing list

List archive

Re: [opennic-discuss] [VOTE] vote for .box


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Amrit Panesar <apanesar AT 4195tech.com>
  • To: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
  • Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] [VOTE] vote for .box
  • Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2011 11:40:31 -0700
  • List-archive: <http://lists.darkdna.net/pipermail/discuss>
  • List-id: <discuss.lists.opennicproject.org>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 8/16/2011 10:14 AM, mike wrote:
> On 11-08-16 12:08 PM, Dominique Rehborn wrote:
>> i don't see why we shouldn't enforce policies. it's not censorship,
>> it is a restriction for the usage of a TLD.
>
> "Prohibited contents and behavior" + enforcement == censorship
>
> Please, let us at least call a spade a spade here.

[snip]

> My question to all that is; Why is none of that clarification in the
> charter?


You sir are 100% correct. I withdraw my vote in favor for this TLD until
the clause of the charter is changed and re-worded.


- --Amrit
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJOSrmfAAoJEA/K84XwmW5aL8oH/2dHfEK4MJSxiPNC2jYeyHvL
CHoXx9YSK89js7TnCk5CAZnByrUqZEGINVqwcYkbRuIFiHrFmGurp3Ual6Eznm7e
75YBY1MtDKFQs48srfYcS3+oPNsJeNALHPScC9FjHzHKmyTFBnbqpDy5x4EJ4JLs
Hq64QndmooN1AAz2p3kQ27QOG7Y9mjAqiQPQhCT1wKNPnJA8cUk1phXpQVwGm8Wh
NEbPK8Bh1TvafNFSz7KupMCddWDEcxiP9/MECms6wCliRQ8HvW9plyuARo5qCXx7
Kaf6Gxsl/JIcmj5WnlZ7sI47pHe1XGbbTvinY34pRKKXQHwFZP29kl0l5XsW0yQ=
=5+4R
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page