Discuss mailing list

[mike <mike AT pikeaero.com>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 11-08-16 12:08 PM, Dominique Rehborn wrote:
> i don't see why we shouldn't enforce policies. it's not censorship, it
> is a restriction for the usage of a TLD.

"Prohibited contents and behavior" + enforcement == censorship

Please, let us at least call a spade a spade here.

"Prohibited content" is just another way of saying "content censorship",
they mean the same thing.

Okay, so you explained some of your intent in your previous post, and
you attempted to add some clarification, I don't agree with much of it,
but that's neither here nor there.

My question to all that is; Why is none of that clarification in the
charter?

This was my initial point, few of those things in the "Prohibited
contents and behavior" section are qualified.

If I could attempt to put this another way. In other words, you and I
are different people. By definition we have different world views. It is
impossible for me to see the world through your eyes. Given this, how
can I possibly know your intent if it is not stated clearly? You are
making a lot of assumptions in both your charter and your follow up
posts that everybody thinks and sees the same way that you do. That is
simply not the case.

PS. Pop quiz: Who can spot the "racists" remark in those last remarks?

- --Mike
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJOSqVtAAoJEEzVYN3s3Af7AFYH/2VRnOIcL0Y7pr4Ce6616tJr
xIslT/jXJfPvdO5MvGgjFihY6H9GTlrfzi587xy2qM+uGDkEJBp8B8OSfkMt9VsN
rgJ9OLCX4EM78QUo42gYVqNXVw3azOqP2/+zBsdMWjSZGnt1m2E11bCnL+EP3cTa
UJXzXcbCowdWGu7R0ZlQkqADXHd9R+Cury0jnHhDwS3lczzptcsmrTBkVGMu8eDY
1xKzKm/HiGXMfNZQTU8YtDhYGg4jaRuqUw4AV8ADF+MR3BqXNaPPn0NisiqjLAIt
RYj6rDJ2kpGgxGT+DId7Fapw3pIXvvdGmIzASK0QJOHYP0XPjZ3DgVw2Elraevk=
=c3lG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----