Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

discuss - Re: [opennic-discuss] CMS

discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org

Subject: Discuss mailing list

List archive

Re: [opennic-discuss] CMS


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Amrit Panesar <apanesar AT 4195tech.com>
  • To: "discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org" <discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org>
  • Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] CMS
  • Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 19:45:42 -0800
  • Authentication-results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of apanesar AT 4195tech.com designates 10.229.69.69 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=apanesar AT 4195tech.com

Im just going to throw this idea out there, but XOOPS is a pretty stable CMS;
Ive worked with it in the past, it did well for orginizing information in an
intuitive and eye-catching way. Perhaps it could be looked into as a viable
solution for our conundrum.

--Neo

Sent from my iPhone

On Feb 21, 2012, at 17:37, Brian Koontz <brian AT pongonova.net> wrote:

> On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 09:25:08AM -0500, Mike wrote:
>> I was not aware that "brand" of website CMS was open for debate, I
>> thought we where already decided in WP?
>
> It's not...but debate away anyway.
>
> This is a volunteer organization. Those of us who have been here, who
> run the show from behind the scenes, all hold day jobs that keep us
> busy. The software we run with on OpenNIC is stuff that we can deal
> with and still manage day jobs, night jobs, and other aspects of our
> lives. I realize everyone has their favorite CMS/wiki/whatever. But
> unfortunately, we simply don't have the time necessary to install and
> maintain personally-championed frameworks. Unless, of course, you
> want to pay my consulting fee, at which point I'd be glad to talk to
> you about implementing what you have in mind.
>
> Sorry to come across so curmudgeonly, but since I've seen very few
> people with good ideas actually stick around for the long run (yeah,
> I've been here 10+ years, right on this list), I'll stick with what I
> know.
>
> BTW Mike this isn't aimed at you personally. I just chose to reply to
> yours so I could keep my response in the thread.
>
> --Brian



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page