Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

discuss - Re: [opennic-discuss] register.fur prevents visitor registration by default

discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org

Subject: Discuss mailing list

List archive

Re: [opennic-discuss] register.fur prevents visitor registration by default


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Alex Hanselka <alex AT opennicproject.org>
  • To: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
  • Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] register.fur prevents visitor registration by default
  • Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 17:49:03 -0500

I'd like to point out that startCom allows for free SSL that is
recognized in modern browsers. That being said, I also disagree with the
way SSL has been set up and that there is a cost at all. Not that it
particularly matters what I think, seeing as the world will continue its
SSL shenanigans regardless :)



On 5/30/2012 5:29 PM, Jamyn Shanley wrote:
> On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 4:26 PM, Stephan Jauernick <stephan AT stejau.de>
> wrote:
>> Its neither self signed not prevents registration!
> Show me how to complete registration without manually installing the
> CAcert root certificate on Chrome? It is impossible. Chrome is doing
> the right thing here by completely preventing access. For all other
> browsers, a warning is presented that the certificate is invalid but
> the user is allowed to continue if they jump through a hoop or two.
> Are you suggesting that we train OpenNIC visitors to ignore such
> "critical" warnings? That seems irresponsible.
>
>> Its a CACert signed cert, cacert is a free CA.
> I know what it is. I linked to their compatiblity list on their wiki
> in my original message.
>
>
> --------
> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
> You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
I



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page