discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
Subject: Discuss mailing list
List archive
- From: Dale <dweide9 AT aim.com>
- To: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
- Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] register.fur prevents visitor registration by default
- Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 19:55:15 -0400 (EDT)
If it will take time to initiate Amrit's suggestion, this should be mentioned on the new site. It is important we preemptively address any security concerns a visitor might experience. I don't remember coming across an SSL cert warning on OpenNIC, but I agree that it could be very disconcerning to the uninitiated.
Dale
-----Original Message-----
From: Amrit Panesar <apanesar AT 4195tech.com>
To: discuss <discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org>
Sent: Wed, May 30, 2012 4:35 pm
Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] register.fur prevents visitor registration by default
From: Amrit Panesar <apanesar AT 4195tech.com>
To: discuss <discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org>
Sent: Wed, May 30, 2012 4:35 pm
Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] register.fur prevents visitor registration by default
On 5/30/2012 4:19 PM, opennic AT lewman.us wrote: > On Wed, 30 May 2012 16:59:38 -0500 > Jamyn Shanley <jshanley AT gmail.com> wrote: >> I didn't say it was self-signed, I said CAcert certificates are not >> recognized by most browsers. >> It is not a good idea for a registrar to have warnings presented on >> their SSL pages by default. > I'm having a hard time with this logic. To me, by this logic it means > that you shouldn't be registering non-ICANN approved domains either. > 99.99% of the dns clients out there won't understand the opennic > domains. I think the issue is that in order to get a more polished registration pathway, not only should it be required to have a ssl certificate, but it should be by a trusted authority. Facts are that red warning screens tend to scare shy users off, or at least to the laymen, something broken. Something we can do with the OpenNIC installer is add/register the CACert Certificate Authority on the client's system. IMO this is a compromise, encryption should be mandatory for handling any private information. It would be better if there were free, trusted, ssl certs for everyone. (see: http://www.comodo.com/) I'm not sure if Comodo (or any other SSL service) will accept a CSR for a non-ICANN TLD, it's worth a shot if anyone has a few spare minutes. Again, I will be implementing the highest security and safety measures when the .neo domain registration facility goes live. We can update the OpenNIC installer to give an option for installing the CACert CA, this will cause less confusion then having the user jump through these warning dialogs. (or preventing chrome users from working at all!) -- Amrit Panesar OpeNIC .Neo Administrator [ @neo_desktop ] -------- You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
- Re: [opennic-discuss] register.fur prevents visitor registration by default, (continued)
- Re: [opennic-discuss] register.fur prevents visitor registration by default, Alex Hanselka, 05/30/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] register.fur prevents visitor registration by default, Daniel L, 05/30/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] register.fur prevents visitor registration by default, Jamyn Shanley, 05/30/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] register.fur prevents visitor registration by default, Jamyn Shanley, 05/30/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] register.fur prevents visitor registration by default, Julian DeMarchi, 05/30/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] register.fur prevents visitor registration by default, Alex Hanselka, 05/30/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] register.fur prevents visitor registration by default, Niels Dettenbach, 05/31/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] register.fur prevents visitor registration by default, Martin C, 05/31/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] register.fur prevents visitor registration by default, Dale, 05/30/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] register.fur prevents visitor registration by default, Jamyn Shanley, 05/30/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] register.fur prevents visitor registration by default, Alex Hanselka, 05/30/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] register.fur prevents visitor registration by default, Amrit Panesar, 05/30/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] new website, Julian DeMarchi, 05/30/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] new website, Dale, 05/31/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] register.fur prevents visitor registration by default, Alex Hanselka, 05/30/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] register.fur prevents visitor registration by default, Julian DeMarchi, 05/30/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] register.fur prevents visitor registration by default, Jamyn Shanley, 05/30/2012
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.