Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

discuss - Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removal of non-respondingT2servers

discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org

Subject: Discuss mailing list

List archive

Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removal of non-respondingT2servers


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Dale <dweide9 AT aim.com>
  • To: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
  • Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removal of non-respondingT2servers
  • Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 17:02:49 -0400 (EDT)

>Maybe a mention on the main website once in a while giving credit to
>the top three up-time % or something, or some other positive
>acknowledgement for a job well done
 
Here, here, I second that! This would be a nice way to encourage a race to the top of quality, which would be a nice change from the USA's usual race to the bottom. : (  
(Sorry, just needed to vent a little steam)
Dale
http://dweide9.homelinux.net


-----Original Message-----
From: mike <mike AT pikeaero.com>
To: discuss <discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org>
Sent: Wed, Aug 15, 2012 12:19 pm
Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removal of non-respondingT2servers


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


This proposal and the previous proposal seem like they could
co-exists..no?

In any case, I also agree that there aught to be some regulations in
place that support quality of service.

Maybe a mention on the main website once in a while giving credit to
the top three up-time % or something, or some other positive
acknowledgement for a job well done rather than only punishment for a
poor (or indeterminate) job.

- -- Mike

On 08/15/2012 02:21 PM, Aaron J. Angel wrote:
> Slightly different principal.  A resolver can't find DNS servers
> until it's told where to look.  Also, users don't want to fuss with
> settings regularly.  The original issue was with new operators.  Or
> new servers. So impose a probationary period on new operators.  Or
> new servers. Don't list them as ready until they have a proven
> track record.


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQK/YBAAoJEA7EcEr0emgfLBkH/0hiMjNtdeHmW1/aFu6b/Tro
u3Pgks3M+oiGlumbtaV7WTJLOidwsQoAMt9x80hLM8NKg1L5kr6HnXRf529C16gf
5qlYok6Ww4g2qz68n0PqOYaByXeKJRvvOXCsZ1Ni//ToJ+KMTn2rX01JnSaFDXKA
STwd5i9v35Rg3H4RZy9ERxwlEzFoAEzRQtzPlSX81/MNaWLFVFj7oOjFDFxNDqdi
iQcmOMS7wP9UKatcomUvlyIkTD0ywYI0ilRpM89qF+e2MgHehkmyXlYwZXW++wvc
EEZc+ieJhJHH6XKS25TI+rwkvJdJBSAp82dwnuUqmVr2bL3bWW608cUvJxOPyn0=
=oYlP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


--------
You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. 
You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page