discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
Subject: Discuss mailing list
List archive
- From: Dale <dweide9 AT aim.com>
- To: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
- Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removal of non-respondingT2servers
- Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 17:02:49 -0400 (EDT)
>Maybe a mention on the main website once in a while giving credit to
>the top three up-time % or something, or some other positive
>acknowledgement for a job well done
>the top three up-time % or something, or some other positive
>acknowledgement for a job well done
Here, here, I second that! This would be a nice way to encourage a race to the top of quality, which would be a nice change from the USA's usual race to the bottom. : (
(Sorry, just needed to vent a little steam)
Dale
http://dweide9.homelinux.net
-----Original Message-----
From: mike <mike AT pikeaero.com>
To: discuss <discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org>
Sent: Wed, Aug 15, 2012 12:19 pm
Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removal of non-respondingT2servers
From: mike <mike AT pikeaero.com>
To: discuss <discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org>
Sent: Wed, Aug 15, 2012 12:19 pm
Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removal of non-respondingT2servers
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 This proposal and the previous proposal seem like they could co-exists..no? In any case, I also agree that there aught to be some regulations in place that support quality of service. Maybe a mention on the main website once in a while giving credit to the top three up-time % or something, or some other positive acknowledgement for a job well done rather than only punishment for a poor (or indeterminate) job. - -- Mike On 08/15/2012 02:21 PM, Aaron J. Angel wrote: > Slightly different principal. A resolver can't find DNS servers > until it's told where to look. Also, users don't want to fuss with > settings regularly. The original issue was with new operators. Or > new servers. So impose a probationary period on new operators. Or > new servers. Don't list them as ready until they have a proven > track record. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQK/YBAAoJEA7EcEr0emgfLBkH/0hiMjNtdeHmW1/aFu6b/Tro u3Pgks3M+oiGlumbtaV7WTJLOidwsQoAMt9x80hLM8NKg1L5kr6HnXRf529C16gf 5qlYok6Ww4g2qz68n0PqOYaByXeKJRvvOXCsZ1Ni//ToJ+KMTn2rX01JnSaFDXKA STwd5i9v35Rg3H4RZy9ERxwlEzFoAEzRQtzPlSX81/MNaWLFVFj7oOjFDFxNDqdi iQcmOMS7wP9UKatcomUvlyIkTD0ywYI0ilRpM89qF+e2MgHehkmyXlYwZXW++wvc EEZc+ieJhJHH6XKS25TI+rwkvJdJBSAp82dwnuUqmVr2bL3bWW608cUvJxOPyn0= =oYlP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -------- You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removalofnon-respondingT2servers, (continued)
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removalofnon-respondingT2servers, Jeff Taylor, 08/16/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removalofnon-respondingT2servers, Falk Husemann, 08/16/2012
- Message not available
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removalofnon-respondingT2servers, Dean Gardiner, 08/16/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removalofnon-respondingT2servers, Dean Gardiner, 08/16/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removalofnon-respondingT2servers, Jeff Taylor, 08/16/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal forremovalofnon-respondingT2servers, mike, 08/16/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removal of non-respondingT2servers, Falk Husemann, 08/15/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removal of non-respondingT2servers, Jeff Taylor, 08/15/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removal of non-respondingT2servers, Dale, 08/15/2012
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.