discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
Subject: Discuss mailing list
List archive
- From: mike <mike AT pikeaero.com>
- To: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
- Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal forremovalofnon-respondingT2servers
- Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 03:10:23 -0500
- Envelope-to: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Nice!
On 08/16/2012 01:52 AM, Jeff Taylor wrote:
>
> OK, as an initial test of this idea, I present the following:
>
> http://www.opennicproject.org/t2log/stats.php
>
> The code uses GeoIP to grab a short list of IPv4 servers near you,
> and checks the percentage of passes in the previous 3 months to
> give a 5-star rating. The stars are given as follows: 5 = 95-100%
> 4 = 90-94.9% 3 = 85-89.9% 2 = 80-84.9% 1 = 75-79.9% 0 = anything
> less than 75%
>
> The scale is arbitrary, but works for this demo. Note that the
> server percentages are currently static, but were generated from
> today's data.
>
> Something like this could be presented to users reading the page on
> how to get connected to OpenNic... it's nice and simple, and gives
> them a lot of info at a glance. If we could also combine this with
> some javascript code that tests ping-times for each server, I think
> this chart would provide every detail that anyone could want to
> know?
>
>
> -------- You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. You may
> unsubscribe by emailing
> discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQLKroAAoJEA7EcEr0emgfoaMH/2+YvADdVJTpxRzU3URBkwAX
9M6rwZoXwoV04f0DSXPbaIRRSyp8JisFMlgO9i/dMSExfYtVdb9WDC6xXodj+m+N
IFA9/IWfmO7ctjzmefWZJVouAelNEvZaKGXN2LZi1f2BgKuLgF6pyUAIoIIJoZab
OvTsQT/Im6F2i3Xcz3EumDJ704V+D/cCH3q3waH7mL1Z75R4rhStw0lUIz332Q62
jy0HMZfHew9JqjFrpbOWcn4680CNprDMQqBQ/WzkjkDzbtF+OEiJ5dadLVENbEDh
EWSSCh2XphV9kpOHglLQIqgzKVgmb5rkEQxtFTYGKgpMXhrT+3Czv9hvircGJ2U=
=A2nn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removal ofnon-respondingT2servers, (continued)
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removal ofnon-respondingT2servers, Sam Dodrill, 08/15/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removalofnon-respondingT2servers, mike, 08/16/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removalofnon-respondingT2servers, Sam Dodrill, 08/16/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removalofnon-respondingT2servers, Jeff Taylor, 08/16/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removalofnon-respondingT2servers, Falk Husemann, 08/16/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removalofnon-respondingT2servers, Jeff Taylor, 08/16/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removalofnon-respondingT2servers, Falk Husemann, 08/16/2012
- Message not available
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removalofnon-respondingT2servers, Dean Gardiner, 08/16/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removalofnon-respondingT2servers, Dean Gardiner, 08/16/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removalofnon-respondingT2servers, Jeff Taylor, 08/16/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal forremovalofnon-respondingT2servers, mike, 08/16/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removal of non-respondingT2servers, Falk Husemann, 08/15/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removal of non-respondingT2servers, Jeff Taylor, 08/15/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removal of non-respondingT2servers, Dale, 08/15/2012
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.