discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
Subject: Discuss mailing list
List archive
- From: Falk Husemann <josen AT paketsequenz.de>
- To: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
- Cc: josen AT paketsequenz.de
- Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removalofnon-respondingT2servers
- Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 09:28:33 +0200
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Am 16.08.2012 07:52, schrieb Jeff Taylor:
> OK, as an initial test of this idea, I present the following:
> http://www.opennicproject.org/t2log/stats.php
Looks great.
ICMP with JavaScript is not possible AFAIK, you'd need a java applet
for that.
> 5 = 95-100% 4 = 90-94.9%
> The scale is arbitrary, but works for this demo.
How comes my Server (46.252.139.27) is in the 90-94.9 percent
availability range if I can prove using two different uptimes services
that it's more along 99.5% ?
Wasn't there an outage of the measurement system some weeks ago, IIRC?
Greets,
Falk
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQLKEhAAoJEPPG1NATKThtj18H/2kz0Y9bYOcOqjrmsxLJee+u
SbsaIPeuG7h/i50bLzoU76op8h/2Bi7e14+sgORZ/REibVSjjmve4d51zgNjLa7t
016bG08xEZZCDyj40OFXN9ueJ+z14qbUVV6IWS8vaQ5Wp9aNLpsscsxL0QtMAhFx
f5maVQTqFKzFIJcMMNPHtPle6en8MU6MacB5Sm7dvWWUheoNsi1lbA42CJmx8W35
4wdhpTo4KNwA4/IeCjZq8DsIWxswl40v+cjq3sp0jTtn0GXqhlgldRT9e6T5VtMY
YiZSIY4BuS0w0n2fECroucc2hHKzZtdU50ly+wFRvb0Wrg9QS+crusB3XyjNaHs=
=hXPj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- [opennic-discuss] Increasing relevancy (Was: Policy proposal for removal...), (continued)
- [opennic-discuss] Increasing relevancy (Was: Policy proposal for removal...), Aaron J. Angel, 08/15/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Increasing relevancy (Was: Policy proposalforremoval...), mike, 08/15/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Increasing relevancy (Was: Policy proposalforremoval...), Falk Husemann, 08/16/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Increasing relevancy (Was: Policy proposalforremoval...), Jeff Taylor, 08/16/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removal of non-respondingT2servers, Jeff Taylor, 08/15/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removal ofnon-respondingT2servers, mike, 08/15/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removal ofnon-respondingT2servers, Sam Dodrill, 08/15/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removalofnon-respondingT2servers, mike, 08/16/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removalofnon-respondingT2servers, Sam Dodrill, 08/16/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removalofnon-respondingT2servers, Jeff Taylor, 08/16/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removalofnon-respondingT2servers, Falk Husemann, 08/16/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removalofnon-respondingT2servers, Jeff Taylor, 08/16/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removalofnon-respondingT2servers, Falk Husemann, 08/16/2012
- Message not available
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removalofnon-respondingT2servers, Dean Gardiner, 08/16/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removalofnon-respondingT2servers, Dean Gardiner, 08/16/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removalofnon-respondingT2servers, Jeff Taylor, 08/16/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal forremovalofnon-respondingT2servers, mike, 08/16/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removal of non-respondingT2servers, Falk Husemann, 08/15/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removal of non-respondingT2servers, Jeff Taylor, 08/15/2012
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.