discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
Subject: Discuss mailing list
List archive
- From: Falk Husemann <josen AT paketsequenz.de>
- To: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
- Cc: josen AT paketsequenz.de
- Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] Increasing relevancy (Was: Policy proposalforremoval...)
- Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 09:24:58 +0200
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi there,
Am 16.08.2012 05:32, schrieb mike:
> I've spoken personally to one of the execs of the larger ISPs here
> in Ontario, and I got his interest initially, but having followed
> up, got feedback that his "people" viewed OpenNIC, as you say, sort
> of "a hobby" interest, and our discussions tapered off into radio
> silence.
I started with small local ISPs yesterday. Some of them don't run
their own local DNS caches. And guess what? One of two already wants
one. I will ask them if I may disclose their name and then post more,
if there is interest.
At least this gives us more T2 caches, at best the providers use them
themselves and tell their customers about it.
Doing something about freedom, getting mentioned somewhere and
generally being a "good guy" seems to be a strong incentive, if you
ask for a small commitment to start with. But what more than 128MB
memory and some bandwidth does a T2 need?
Greets,
Falk
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQLKBKAAoJEPPG1NATKThtzk0H/A+kIzONvFZCAPBBDf1bHAkz
SCBDHW6vPj2/2qbAg1VOhoiIZWMRWW+46+T8WRT67eEFQld9Z0mQr1pfSTs546sc
q2l0fQWLtsEe+d0zUrjKzr15ES5jpw3/iCoj0kaip908pCoKMX6TNh1CRz0NrRVY
UzNzS6zAqSVpKwyE2WpxJowmYXEECqt6q45AO7OrC0KKUzPaJ6PDgdvcsO5LhKTO
ObQINnBMqTxLFACIUIs1mKoBDCWFDeag/3+Ri0LsfptSDaiO5QR5FvG+jc7uW8nE
tvzlYOMz04kZ6HpBX6j33Sr1h0IVPvCm9qa3mQmFdJGl+jNSnYedncceeK9LVS4=
=Lus2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removal of non-responding T2 servers, (continued)
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removal of non-responding T2 servers, Brian Koontz, 08/16/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removal of non-respondingT2servers, mike, 08/15/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removal of non-respondingT2servers, Aaron J. Angel, 08/15/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removal of non-respondingT2servers, Peter Green, 08/15/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removal of non-respondingT2servers, opennic, 08/15/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removal of non-respondingT2servers, Alex Hanselka, 08/15/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removal ofnon-respondingT2servers, mike, 08/15/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removal ofnon-respondingT2servers, Aaron J. Angel, 08/15/2012
- [opennic-discuss] Increasing relevancy (Was: Policy proposal for removal...), Aaron J. Angel, 08/15/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Increasing relevancy (Was: Policy proposalforremoval...), mike, 08/15/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Increasing relevancy (Was: Policy proposalforremoval...), Falk Husemann, 08/16/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Increasing relevancy (Was: Policy proposalforremoval...), Jeff Taylor, 08/16/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removal of non-respondingT2servers, Aaron J. Angel, 08/15/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removal of non-respondingT2servers, Jeff Taylor, 08/15/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removal ofnon-respondingT2servers, mike, 08/15/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removal ofnon-respondingT2servers, Sam Dodrill, 08/15/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removalofnon-respondingT2servers, mike, 08/16/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removalofnon-respondingT2servers, Sam Dodrill, 08/16/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removalofnon-respondingT2servers, Jeff Taylor, 08/16/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removalofnon-respondingT2servers, Falk Husemann, 08/16/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removalofnon-respondingT2servers, Jeff Taylor, 08/16/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removalofnon-respondingT2servers, Falk Husemann, 08/16/2012
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.