discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
Subject: Discuss mailing list
List archive
- From: Jeff Taylor <shdwdrgn AT sourpuss.net>
- To: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
- Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] Increasing relevancy (Was: Policy proposalforremoval...)
- Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 08:37:40 -0600
For good performance, you will probably want more than 128M of
memory. Bind9 will try to cache as much as possible, and just
judging by what I see here, you would probably want to start with at
least 256M of ram. On 08/16/2012 01:24 AM, Falk Husemann wrote: Hi there,> > > -------- > You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. > You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org |
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removal of non-respondingT2servers, (continued)
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removal of non-respondingT2servers, mike, 08/15/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removal of non-respondingT2servers, Aaron J. Angel, 08/15/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removal of non-respondingT2servers, Peter Green, 08/15/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removal of non-respondingT2servers, opennic, 08/15/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removal of non-respondingT2servers, Alex Hanselka, 08/15/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removal ofnon-respondingT2servers, mike, 08/15/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removal ofnon-respondingT2servers, Aaron J. Angel, 08/15/2012
- [opennic-discuss] Increasing relevancy (Was: Policy proposal for removal...), Aaron J. Angel, 08/15/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Increasing relevancy (Was: Policy proposalforremoval...), mike, 08/15/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Increasing relevancy (Was: Policy proposalforremoval...), Falk Husemann, 08/16/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Increasing relevancy (Was: Policy proposalforremoval...), Jeff Taylor, 08/16/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removal of non-respondingT2servers, Aaron J. Angel, 08/15/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removal of non-respondingT2servers, mike, 08/15/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removal of non-respondingT2servers, Jeff Taylor, 08/15/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removal ofnon-respondingT2servers, mike, 08/15/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removal ofnon-respondingT2servers, Sam Dodrill, 08/15/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removalofnon-respondingT2servers, mike, 08/16/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removalofnon-respondingT2servers, Sam Dodrill, 08/16/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removalofnon-respondingT2servers, Jeff Taylor, 08/16/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removalofnon-respondingT2servers, Falk Husemann, 08/16/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removalofnon-respondingT2servers, Jeff Taylor, 08/16/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removalofnon-respondingT2servers, Falk Husemann, 08/16/2012
- Message not available
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removalofnon-respondingT2servers, Dean Gardiner, 08/16/2012
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.