discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
Subject: Discuss mailing list
List archive
- From: mike <mike AT pikeaero.com>
- To: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
- Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removalofnon-respondingT2servers
- Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 23:11:43 -0500
- Envelope-to: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 08/15/2012 11:37 PM, Sam Dodrill wrote:
> Servers with more uptime get more stars?
Well, on eBay it's different color stars that change color with more
transactions + more positive feedback, and then when you exceed some
threshold of consistent good performance, you get a little sort of
gold medal beside your star, I'm not saying to do exactly that, but
yeah something like that perhaps.
- --Mike
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQLHL/AAoJEA7EcEr0emgfzeoH/0OTpnQYz4vzprRUNx3kZCJm
OpaHQs5bjuGprMcm3sqqTthTu9tgmGjRdIx73qjtxqer013kDkYKcKqXqb/ZQAtJ
HQLxmTKx5oarirbwBq87OVNvY8lpyulQIi2dyKx3coo+Y+qc4ZuthbeMFaOManCN
8BJoRhC8vJ4bySzwIIA+P3Hmbf+/zSLE/FEsa6FNddywYOm1tHlv/5gf2IIbyApE
vHZwLfQBDu/V3xwa5hILpGLyE13HvFYhP3X43+QaS3jNwUSrneGmlzr01JJeC4zL
QWNnNT4s83Xgd0okHWvbhWo3NuvXU0C5qTyx82tZ2KtpwWv1U69SBFrwu+D06Hk=
=744e
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removal of non-respondingT2servers, (continued)
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removal of non-respondingT2servers, Alex Hanselka, 08/15/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removal ofnon-respondingT2servers, mike, 08/15/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removal ofnon-respondingT2servers, Aaron J. Angel, 08/15/2012
- [opennic-discuss] Increasing relevancy (Was: Policy proposal for removal...), Aaron J. Angel, 08/15/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Increasing relevancy (Was: Policy proposalforremoval...), mike, 08/15/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Increasing relevancy (Was: Policy proposalforremoval...), Falk Husemann, 08/16/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Increasing relevancy (Was: Policy proposalforremoval...), Jeff Taylor, 08/16/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removal of non-respondingT2servers, Jeff Taylor, 08/15/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removal ofnon-respondingT2servers, mike, 08/15/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removal ofnon-respondingT2servers, Sam Dodrill, 08/15/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removalofnon-respondingT2servers, mike, 08/16/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removalofnon-respondingT2servers, Sam Dodrill, 08/16/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removalofnon-respondingT2servers, Jeff Taylor, 08/16/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removalofnon-respondingT2servers, Falk Husemann, 08/16/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removalofnon-respondingT2servers, Jeff Taylor, 08/16/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removalofnon-respondingT2servers, Falk Husemann, 08/16/2012
- Message not available
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removalofnon-respondingT2servers, Dean Gardiner, 08/16/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removalofnon-respondingT2servers, Dean Gardiner, 08/16/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removalofnon-respondingT2servers, Jeff Taylor, 08/16/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal forremovalofnon-respondingT2servers, mike, 08/16/2012
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.