discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
Subject: Discuss mailing list
List archive
- From: mike <mike AT pikeaero.com>
- To: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
- Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removal ofnon-respondingT2servers
- Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 22:36:16 -0500
- Envelope-to: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 08/15/2012 11:26 PM, Jeff Taylor wrote:
> Reading through here, one idea that comes to mind would be to have
> a page which recommends servers that should be geographically
> nearby and have a good uptime, but also suggest that another list
> of servers may provide a faster response, but their reliability is
> uncertain (either due to actual bad uptime, or due to being a new
> server with a short history). Essentially give people the option
> of going with known reliability, or be a 'beta tester' for a newer
> connection. I think this would allow end-users to make their own
> choice based on the data we can provide, but still allow the newer
> servers to get a fair shot at visibility.
Exactly! Maybe even make it brain-dead simple to identify with a star
icon system (like eBay users) or something like that.
- --Mike
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQLGqwAAoJEA7EcEr0emgf+FwIAI/O6XIvf4xTTz214Q2/EjxM
do4Itz5WhD4Y9Ary7VGAfwZGtPgi2yjm4aEzggRjHmIvYPoErMkJVXxhjLPI0YJq
4lDNeXeAXwQV22BglcB81jRkI9UHI0kRaUD77iQOvB/sw9v8SZSpTA5hgWWnw3ps
I6Tt0Hyj17myYDJj88SqR1r8kUzk/zSxLOtxrX5ULUGngJ9ezRcylK+MgiP+n0zo
yYXBE6GJLi0QrytcivGZ4QYmSlFIz4FHiAePcxAI6EZNPLAeeIJvojBR7W8FzNxa
O6//3PzXhPL4t6hLuoaESIKp38vTZHvJ7cj/oIgNEB/JLOIUH2OMBMDWnvrjj7c=
=AZHE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removal of non-respondingT2servers, (continued)
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removal of non-respondingT2servers, Peter Green, 08/15/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removal of non-respondingT2servers, opennic, 08/15/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removal of non-respondingT2servers, Alex Hanselka, 08/15/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removal ofnon-respondingT2servers, mike, 08/15/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removal ofnon-respondingT2servers, Aaron J. Angel, 08/15/2012
- [opennic-discuss] Increasing relevancy (Was: Policy proposal for removal...), Aaron J. Angel, 08/15/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Increasing relevancy (Was: Policy proposalforremoval...), mike, 08/15/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Increasing relevancy (Was: Policy proposalforremoval...), Falk Husemann, 08/16/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Increasing relevancy (Was: Policy proposalforremoval...), Jeff Taylor, 08/16/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removal of non-respondingT2servers, Jeff Taylor, 08/15/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removal ofnon-respondingT2servers, mike, 08/15/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removal ofnon-respondingT2servers, Sam Dodrill, 08/15/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removalofnon-respondingT2servers, mike, 08/16/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removalofnon-respondingT2servers, Sam Dodrill, 08/16/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removalofnon-respondingT2servers, Jeff Taylor, 08/16/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removalofnon-respondingT2servers, Falk Husemann, 08/16/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removalofnon-respondingT2servers, Jeff Taylor, 08/16/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removalofnon-respondingT2servers, Falk Husemann, 08/16/2012
- Message not available
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removalofnon-respondingT2servers, Dean Gardiner, 08/16/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removalofnon-respondingT2servers, Dean Gardiner, 08/16/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removalofnon-respondingT2servers, Jeff Taylor, 08/16/2012
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.