discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
Subject: Discuss mailing list
List archive
- From: Jeff Taylor <shdwdrgn AT sourpuss.net>
- To: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
- Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removal of non-respondingT2servers
- Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 21:26:56 -0600
Reading through here, one idea that comes to mind would be to have a
page which recommends servers that should be geographically nearby and
have a good uptime, but also suggest that another list of servers may
provide a faster response, but their reliability is uncertain (either
due to actual bad uptime, or due to being a new server with a short
history). Essentially give people the option of going with known
reliability, or be a 'beta tester' for a newer connection. I think this
would allow end-users to make their own choice based on the data we can
provide, but still allow the newer servers to get a fair shot at visibility.
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removal of non-respondingT2servers, (continued)
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removal of non-respondingT2servers, Aaron J. Angel, 08/15/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removal of non-respondingT2servers, Peter Green, 08/15/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removal of non-respondingT2servers, opennic, 08/15/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removal of non-respondingT2servers, Alex Hanselka, 08/15/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removal ofnon-respondingT2servers, mike, 08/15/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removal ofnon-respondingT2servers, Aaron J. Angel, 08/15/2012
- [opennic-discuss] Increasing relevancy (Was: Policy proposal for removal...), Aaron J. Angel, 08/15/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Increasing relevancy (Was: Policy proposalforremoval...), mike, 08/15/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Increasing relevancy (Was: Policy proposalforremoval...), Falk Husemann, 08/16/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Increasing relevancy (Was: Policy proposalforremoval...), Jeff Taylor, 08/16/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removal of non-respondingT2servers, Aaron J. Angel, 08/15/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removal of non-respondingT2servers, Jeff Taylor, 08/15/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removal ofnon-respondingT2servers, mike, 08/15/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removal ofnon-respondingT2servers, Sam Dodrill, 08/15/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removalofnon-respondingT2servers, mike, 08/16/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removalofnon-respondingT2servers, Sam Dodrill, 08/16/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removalofnon-respondingT2servers, Jeff Taylor, 08/16/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removalofnon-respondingT2servers, Falk Husemann, 08/16/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removalofnon-respondingT2servers, Jeff Taylor, 08/16/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removalofnon-respondingT2servers, Falk Husemann, 08/16/2012
- Message not available
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removalofnon-respondingT2servers, Dean Gardiner, 08/16/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Policy proposal for removalofnon-respondingT2servers, Dean Gardiner, 08/16/2012
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.