Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

discuss - Re: [opennic-discuss] The website

discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org

Subject: Discuss mailing list

List archive

Re: [opennic-discuss] The website


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Peter Green <peter AT greenpete.free>
  • To: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
  • Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] The website
  • Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2012 12:32:38 +0000

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

As, I have said (off list) if your network prevents you from accessing
OpenNIC resolvers, then please feel free to use one of several web proxies
the OpenNIC members provide.

My proxy at http://nano-host.co.uk/proxy/ gives you access to OpenNIC domains.

If it's a country specific problem then let me know which country (Japan I
think in this case) and I'll check to see why it's blocked.

Alternatively I could move the whole demo site to an I.C.A.N.N. domain, which
would be somewhat ironic! ;-)

Peter


nanashiRei <nanashi.rei AT gmail.com> wrote:

>Can we *please* compile a Wiki page with all the ***important*** stuff
>that's topic related, i am totally lost here. And i'm currently unable
>to access the demopage or forum.
>
>P.S.: I'll be out for a few hours. nite.
>
>Am 05.12.2012 12:53, schrieb Jamyn Shanley:
>> On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 7:55 PM, Brian Koontz
><brian AT opennicproject.org>wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 03:19:43PM -0600, Jamyn Shanley wrote:
>>>> The vast majority of OpenNIC information could (should?) be put on
>the
>>>> website, and not a wiki. Essentially there's core information that
>needs
>>> to
>>>> be communicated, and all of that could be put on a website (dynamic
>or
>>> not):
>>>
>>> The original intent of the wiki was to serve as a technical
>>> repository. AFAIK, you all can do what you want. This happens
>every
>>> so often: New blood comes on board, demands change to the
>>> latest/greatest web platform flavor of the day, then departs the fix
>>> without a trace. Seen it happen more times than I can count. So
>call
>>> me jaded, call me a stick in the mud, whatever. I'll just leave the
>>> wiki open and available. Someone else wants to come along and
>>> reinvent the wheel, by all means do so.
>>>
>>> To me, the wasted effort comes from duplicating work that's already
>>> been done. You all want pretty? Make a pretty website. But if you
>>> do, plan on sticking around for the long run to maintain it, update
>>> the contents, etc. Otherwise, it just becomes one in a long line of
>>> failed efforts to get the info to the masses
>>>
>>
>> To be direct with you - I have to say, out of all possible responses
>to
>> feedback, yours is the least useful. It doesn't encourage help, it
>doesn't
>> promote goodwill, and it doesn't paint the project in any sort of a
>good
>> light. Your response is stereotypically cranky and irritable and "old
>> sysadmin" and does not convey any of the qualities of what people
>would
>> want to see in a project lead. People want to volunteer for someone
>they
>> like. Would you volunteer your time for someone that responded to
>you? Read
>> your post again. If you're honest with yourself, you'd admit you come
>off
>> as grouchy and irritable and you're not promoting any sort of work.
>>
>> You want change? Lead. You hear lots of people saying "we should do
>X", and
>> it has some merit? Delegate. That's what a leader does. Nobody said
>you
>> have to do anything. You don't even have to put very much effort into
>it;
>> delegation is easy. It's trivial to take the task, cut it into
>manageable
>> pieces, and ask for volunteers/delegate.
>>
>> If people step forward, they want it done. If nobody does, the idea
>dies.
>> Either way, you don't come off the way you just did... that is the
>> constructive way to deal with things. Tell me - what exactly do you
>feel
>> you are accomplishing by standing in the way of the discussion and
>loudly
>> proclaiming doom and gloom?
>>
>>
>> --------
>> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
>> You may unsubscribe by emailing
>discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
>>

- --
Wanged from my Kaiser by a mischievous pixie!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: APG v1.0.8

iQFBBAEBCAArBQJQvz7lJBxQZXRlciBHcmVlbiA8cGV0ZXJAZ3JlZW5wZXRlLmNv
LnVrPgAKCRDwSqngs+9nOQQlB/0WjCkycO2dKRXLSHNuE1M00zFv8wZwzKXU8Dbm
WoxA79LtgrLK5+bObUpOVlrUxIvqypgXf6LPGv9ED4dl2j4OLTbGqA4q/1xeX6WV
cJGBB47we58l47ny2jhZJkvVw4lXYiLAMamQAF+sQyyUaoGsqN3ixSl7wvLcNBd7
DXBQWqO+b9D5DS4vESb6vdXhX+2I1pr86Cr9xsDxUwOYa7BF5y9oBKv0yPhWcvAZ
vJUG/vh6YK6u7eVxQZa8WbuK/NnIn/OK1J7SV+LYmIIz1QwI8qzuZWqjHsKJ9nzN
Jops988ZKaHg2sd4fazIF5CjOY3EjR3SwsK4oGQ9c8YLfYIj
=nc+S
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page