Discuss mailing list

[Peter Green <peter AT greenpete.free>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256


I wonder if the code is somehow picking up the server location rather than 
the browsers location and the Slovenian I.P. is just an incorrect database 
entry?

Peter

Mike Skelly <dracoling AT gmail.com> wrote:

>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA1
>
>
>On Dec 9, 2012, at 6:32 PM, Peter Green wrote:
>
>> I got the  'nearest server' feature working thanks to Brian and
>> NanashRei, but I would like confirmation that the results it displays
>> are right for others as they aren't for me.
>
>When entering the site from both my New York and New Jersey networks I
>get "Your nearest D.N.S. servers are: 37.1.89.161 (GB) 213.138.101.252
>(GB)".
>
>I'm expecting when I browse from 64.0.55.180 that 64.0.55.201
>(ns1.ny.us) should at least be an option ;)
>
>I'd say the selection code isn't working right.
>
>- - dracoling
>
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin)
>Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
>
>iEYEARECAAYFAlDFPckACgkQfgj0rcbl80+W1wCeNJE8SOPajg3NWYDdojQpNarE
>Rw0An2EJ3Vr02U9QhXHUodhmMFISlP3d
>=9i8m
>-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
>--------
>You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
>You may unsubscribe by emailing
>discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org

- --
Wanged from my Kaiser by a mischievous pixie!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: APG v1.0.8

iQFBBAEBCAArBQJQxT9hJBxQZXRlciBHcmVlbiA8cGV0ZXJAZ3JlZW5wZXRlLmNv
LnVrPgAKCRDwSqngs+9nOXzZB/9Xl0RHPV31L4YoJsvVpvJvsxJLyXn89SwivV/y
hQ+6d33yJtOzyWsQgakPh+YnoUXrRcSCcN2i/ud4+OiGDu5Mumrq927vwiyLIhhM
157iisff/4n/UuXnTwYmQdlUxc3RT6eA4InVSGHq15tOd/ZhZtjkt/MP8wG+OGnQ
FEjG0cN5jEA8s032i6bEinu5tpXm+9q8Evf+SqTZxcs1O8V5y+czNK7ATVO7oWde
IuPn4QEVo3kNU125Sw6KZwfDKCyKp2edtVgiF24ImPkkzs7eBmlajYyI9xxlcyQW
4n3UTG2G+Uf1XibKLyMwgOdeQDkr+nvV0Sm/dNS2/hKr2Ihk
=dAK3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----