Discuss mailing list

[Asier Garaialde - GipuzkoaShare <agaraialde AT gipuzkoashare.net>]

My last paragrah about .eh was a joke... See the emoticon...

I also think that .eh may be problematic...

What about .ek TLD? There isn't any .ek code in ISO 3166-1 or 3166 
-1 alpha2; then, there won't be any conflict now or in a near future.

Asier


Enviado desde mi iPhone

El 2013 ots 5, a las 14:43, "Aaron J. Angel" <thatoneguy AT aaronjangel.us> 
escribió:

> On 02/05/2013 08:10 AM, Asier Garaialde - GipuzkoaShare wrote:
>> Personally, I think that Western Sahara never will use .eh TLD... ;-)
> 
> That may be the case, but that is their choice.  Two-letter TLDs are 
> designated country code TLDs, and their assignment is based on an 
> international standard (ISO 3166-1).  Conflicts between OpenNIC and ICANN 
> designations may very well exist from time to time.  However, I see no good 
> reasons to intentionally introduce a conflict with IANA-designated ccTLDs 
> as is being proposed here.