Discuss mailing list

[Christopher <weblionx AT gmail.com>]

I certainly am interested in the idea behind this.

One point to note is (and maybe you've noted it already) you'd likely
be a lot better off doing fiber to the home to start with. I know many
houses out there, even with a professional contractor, would be a pain
to wire for a few Ethernet drops, much more so to make many fiber
drops all over the home. For sure, even a single 1Gb link would be
more than most families could saturate, even with a few HDTV channels
streaming. Plus, more devices are going wireless and even the best
current wireless connection is around 300Mbps, with 1Gbps+ still on
the horizon.

But, if you can get even 1Gbps to the home I'd be interested,
especially if it comes with native IPv6 access. I wouldn't even care
about more than one (well, maybe two, I could do something with two)
IPv4 addresses. Your only competitor would be Google's fiber at that
point, and they're being very slow with their roll-outs.

And here's a somewhat off-the-wall question, would you look to provide
dial-in or WISP access in the future for members that are accessing
from various areas off the fiber network?

- C. R.

On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 2:16 AM, Alex M (Coyo) <coyo AT darkdna.net> wrote:
> On 04/13/2013 12:39 AM, Bjorn Peeters wrote:
>>
>> Still, someone with the money, know-how, and who doesnt like the current
>> system, could probably pull it off.
>> Which is why, how unlikely it is, i'd still be very much interested to see
>> this come to life.
>> And, ofcourse, Opennic would be used as the defacto dns i suppose? :)
>
>
> Well, obviously I'd mirror the OpenNIC TLDs and provide access to the
> OpenNIC name system.
>
> Why else would I be here?
>
> It's not like Alex Hanselka ever talks to me anymore.
>
>
>
> --------
> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. You may unsubscribe by
> emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org