Discuss mailing list

[Travis McCrea <me AT travismccrea.com>]

It's not even legal battles. I think ICANN would be more responsive to us if 
we actually had a userbase of more people than a handful of nerds (no 
offense). If we want to be taken seriously, we need to be in the media, 
writing press releases, etc. Is there a single successful .free domain name 
other than reg.for.free? 

Guillaume Parent wrote:
> At the same time, it's one of the only ways the project can reasonably
> not clash until we get investors with billions of dollars to spend on
> legal battles.
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 11:30 AM, subhuman <discipline AT gmx.net
> <mailto:discipline AT gmx.net>> wrote:
>
>     On Mon, 22 Apr 2013 08:11:30 -0700
>     Kenny Taylor <kennytaylor AT runbox.com
>     <mailto:kennytaylor AT runbox.com>> wrote:
>
>     > In the long run, maybe we create a TLD that ICANN would not
>     take, like ".opennic".  We could define 2LDs like free.opennic and
>     offer registrations of the 3LDs.
>     that would mean yielding to arrogance.
>
>     --
>     The only cure to the evils of Democracy is more Democracy.
>
>
>     --------
>     You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
>     You may unsubscribe by emailing
>     discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
>     <mailto:discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org>
>
>