Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

discuss - Re: [opennic-discuss] Hi list!

discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org

Subject: Discuss mailing list

List archive

Re: [opennic-discuss] Hi list!


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Christopher <weblionx AT gmail.com>
  • To: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
  • Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] Hi list!
  • Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 18:29:33 -0400

Domains aren't an issue, all T1s mirror each other. The problem is the
registration sites aren't distributed like that.

On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 6:17 PM, Ian Carroll
<ian.carroll AT snapstudiodesign.com> wrote:
> I'm going to go ahead and defeat the whole purpose of decentralized systems
> and say we need a central fallback server that has all records for all TLD's
> and when the main T1/2 server is dead it goes to that server.
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 6:04 PM, J.B. BERLIN <endlesspixel AT hotmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I think that it would be better run the all services with more uptime if
>> they where more standards
>> for the Opennic service like for registration, webfrontends ect.
>>
>> J.B.
>>
>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- From: Peter Green
>> Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2013 11:35 PM
>> To: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
>> Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] Hi list!
>>
>>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>>> sites look down.
>>
>>
>> You know, this really isn't good and in the light of I.C.A.N.N. firing
>> up more T.L.D.s that collide with ours, no one in their right mind
>> will take us seriously when our services are so often unreliable :-(
>>
>> It seems T1's and their services more so than T2.
>>
>> Is this the way it always is/has been or is it a symptom of the
>> feelings caused by the onset of such domain collisions... i.e. is this
>> just going to get worse as more and more OpenNIC sys-admins feel they
>> are wasting their time and don't keep their services up and running
>> 99.**% of the time?
>>
>> Is OpenNIC going to end up simply an alternative DNS provider (which
>> would be no bad thing in and of itself perhaps)?
>>
>> Peter
>>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
>> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
>>
>> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSDUmPAAoJEPBKqeCz72c5OicH/R5Lsi6+mrRT9yb8tQArAQxz
>> 0YhJ2VI23KXCaRkdVEgamqMK+6qj9zulQW3pgE6zXuUKtE6KlKJI9HgRuKlZbvK6
>> Y0KABBkZFQx3LCVbYjOMi4DL9vPpLz1xw/xOwyvcIzHwr8F1UlTj3YzTP+G5dL2z
>> 5OS35oO2pK8t6yOM41hICxrL3vY5v1j53W71VVTaFiRqFNXbYOews05JlrobA2vj
>> 5YCNm0HormEptbBIEcXbqWyvtJ1eLh4Z8pEBnFXdRthibUOLzIAebRhvSiDE8TLA
>> TRvQFfj7uR7Xg1mGJI75DjP23Ib+SxnKYG6VkJwROG0EgAWeCu0iGWHQwDliWFQ=
>> =xTRI
>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>
>>
>> --------
>> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
>> You may unsubscribe by emailing
>> discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
>>
>>
>> --------
>> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. You may unsubscribe by
>> emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
>
>
>
>
> --
> If you can see this, this email was sent from Ian Carroll's personal
> account.
> This email is not signed. The email must be signed by Comodo to the name of
> Ian Carroll.
> You are responsible for any damages if you transact under this unsigned
> email and I cannot sign it for you.
>
>
> --------
> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
> You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page