Discuss mailing list

[Ian Carroll <ian.carroll AT snapstudiodesign.com>]

What if we had one central registration site?

On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 6:29 PM, Christopher <weblionx AT gmail.com> wrote:

Domains aren't an issue, all T1s mirror each other. The problem is the
registration sites aren't distributed like that.

On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 6:17 PM, Ian Carroll
<ian.carroll AT snapstudiodesign.com> wrote:
> I'm going to go ahead and defeat the whole purpose of decentralized systems
> and say we need a central fallback server that has all records for all TLD's
> and when the main T1/2 server is dead it goes to that server.
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 6:04 PM, J.B. BERLIN <endlesspixel AT hotmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I think that it would be better run the all services with more uptime if
>> they where more standards
>> for the Opennic service like for registration, webfrontends ect.
>>
>> J.B.
>>
>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- From: Peter Green
>> Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2013 11:35 PM
>> To: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
>> Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] Hi list!
>>
>>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>>> sites look down.
>>
>>
>> You know, this really isn't good and in the light of I.C.A.N.N. firing
>> up more T.L.D.s that collide with ours, no one in their right mind
>> will take us seriously when our services are so often unreliable :-(
>>
>> It seems T1's and their services more so than T2.
>>
>> Is this the way it always is/has been or is it a symptom of the
>> feelings caused by the onset of such domain collisions... i.e. is this
>> just going to get worse as more and more OpenNIC sys-admins feel they
>> are wasting their time and don't keep their services up and running
>> 99.**% of the time?
>>
>> Is OpenNIC going to end up simply an alternative DNS provider (which
>> would be no bad thing in and of itself perhaps)?
>>
>> Peter
>>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
>> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
>>
>> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSDUmPAAoJEPBKqeCz72c5OicH/R5Lsi6+mrRT9yb8tQArAQxz
>> 0YhJ2VI23KXCaRkdVEgamqMK+6qj9zulQW3pgE6zXuUKtE6KlKJI9HgRuKlZbvK6
>> Y0KABBkZFQx3LCVbYjOMi4DL9vPpLz1xw/xOwyvcIzHwr8F1UlTj3YzTP+G5dL2z
>> 5OS35oO2pK8t6yOM41hICxrL3vY5v1j53W71VVTaFiRqFNXbYOews05JlrobA2vj
>> 5YCNm0HormEptbBIEcXbqWyvtJ1eLh4Z8pEBnFXdRthibUOLzIAebRhvSiDE8TLA
>> TRvQFfj7uR7Xg1mGJI75DjP23Ib+SxnKYG6VkJwROG0EgAWeCu0iGWHQwDliWFQ=
>> =xTRI
>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>
>>
>> --------
>> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
>> You may unsubscribe by emailing
>> discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
>>
>>
>> --------
>> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. You may unsubscribe by
>> emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
>
>
>
>
> --
> If you can see this, this email was sent from Ian Carroll's personal
> account.
> This email is not signed. The email must be signed by Comodo to the name of
> Ian Carroll.
> You are responsible for any damages if you transact under this unsigned
> email and I cannot sign it for you.
>
>
> --------
> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
> You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org


--------
You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org

--

If you can see this, this email was sent from Ian Carroll's personal account. 

This email is not signed. The email must be signed by Comodo to the name of Ian Carroll.

You are responsible for any damages if you transact under this unsigned email and I cannot sign it for you.