Discuss mailing list

[spaesani AT mail.com]

It's not a country and opennic has yet to propose a country code (or name) tld policy.

If you go by the current status the .LL tld proposal would fall under the same category as .js , .ii or . whatever 2 letter tld someone requests here.

Personally I d rather not depend on liberland becoming a nation or not to resolve the opennic country code or name policy status.

Conversely I would not want to see the .LL application be shot down here by insisting two letter TLDs are currently reserved for countries only. It's simply not the case.

Considering liberland may never be recognized as a country I would suggest going with the fair policy of allowing potential country code or name TLDs with the understanding and obligation to cede the tld to new nations upon request.

I ran this idea by Aaron some days back for consideration in any official tld name policy proposal.

I'm now suggesting it here to all members to make it a part of opennics current tld name policy and included in any future tld name policy proposals.

That should ease the country word / name  debate and help us focus on other merits or lack thereof thereof of a tld request.

--
Sent from myMail app for Android

Wednesday, 07 December 2016, 07:10AM -05:00 from Hunter 9999 <mail AT hunter-9999.de>:

That sounds good.
I would also vote yes.
It could be really nice to promote OpenNIC and have an easy and ccTLD like TLD for Liberland.




Am 7. Dezember 2016 13:05:25 MEZ schrieb Gregor <delphi4u AT gmail.com>:
>Hey guys,
>Yeah, there might be some confusion with LL/ll and II/ii but, there is
>not much we can do about it.
>
>Liberland is now widely recognized entity/organisation in world of
>media.... it has articles about it in almost all big press agencies of
>the world... BBC, CNN, Washington Post, The Times,... etc... It has
>represetative offices in over 80 countries. So I guess we can consider
>it preety serious entity/organisation whatever you like.
>As you might see they already choose .LL to be their TLD, as currently
>they are using .LL.LAND for their domains. For example:
>http://redcross.ll.land/
>https://market.ll.land/
>http://cadastral.ll.land/
>and so on.
>So I guess most logical tranistion would then be just to cut .LAND off
>and only use .LL and firstly doing it on OpenNIC would be, in my
>opinion, great promotion for both sides.
>
>So If you will vote to peer .LL domains to OpenNIC, my vote is >Yes<.
>
>Cheers
>
>
>Simon Castano je 6.12.2016 ob 13:01 napisal:
>> Hi,
>>
>> We are planning to register .LL for LiberLand, so no rush for you to
>> claim .II
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> ---
>> Simon
>>
>>
>> On 2016-12-03 09:41, spaesani AT mail.com wrote:
>>> Simon I'm going to have an issue with a .II tld as I have been
>>> attempting to get that going here since at least June 2015.
>>> I've been designing / developing iinteractive software for some time
>>> and this is the release venue.
>>> I haven't put through a tld request as various issues needed to be
>>> worked out, namely, 2 letter TLDs which was resolves a while back.
>>> If I have to put in a tld request ASAP to "stake a claim " I'd
>>> appreciate older members letting me know.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Sent from myMail app for Android Tuesday, 29 November 2016, 09:29AM
>>> -05:00 from "Simon Castano" :
>>>
>>>> Dear all,
>>>>
>>>> I have joined this mailing list not long ago and would like to get
>>>> some
>>>> clarifications with regards to registration fee for domain names.
>>>>
>>>> Reading OpenNIC charter, I could not find anything preventing one
>to
>>>>
>>>> charge registration fee for domain names. On the other hand, I feel
>>>> reluctance for approving domain names that would charge a
>>>> registration
>>>> fee.
>>>>
>>>> To me, and to reply to the below, even ICANN domains' are free to
>>>> use as
>>>> one do not pay ICANN when resolving google.com - on the other side,
>>>> running a DNS server or a website is nerver free as one has to host
>>>> website and DNS servers.
>>>> On top of that I think there may be semantic issue with the term
>>>> "free"
>>>> in the below; which I'd translate to "libre" meaning it is open to
>>>> anyone rather than "gratis".
>>>>
>>>> Could you pelase share your opinion on this?
>>>>
>>>> For reference, note that we (Liberland) are planning to run OpenNIC
>>>> servers to operate ".ll" TLD with a bridge to decentralized DNS and
>>>> a
>>>> PKI based on Bitcoin blockchain. We are planning to use our
>>>> E-Resindency
>>>> app as an easy entry point to resolve OpenNIC domain.
>>>> In the meantime, we are lobying to have LL added to the ISO 3166-1
>>>> and
>>>> obtain ICANN delegation to operate this ccTLD so that .ll wesites
>>>> can be
>>>> reached by a broader audience. Note that we would keep on operating
>>>> OpenNIC servers.
>>>> To come back on domain registration fee: we were planning on some
>>>> sort
>>>> of auction where domains registration would be free (i.e. gratis)
>>>> unless
>>>> interested parties bid domain up.
>>>>
>>>> More details to follow on the above at a later stage.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>>
>>>> ---
>>>> Simon J. Castaño Segondy
>>>> Member of the representation of the Free Republic of Liberland in
>>>> the
>>>> Netherlands
>>>>
>>>> On 2016-11-25 15:46, Hunter 9999 wrote:
>>>>> On our website we say "It’s free to use".
>>>>> For me that includes the usage as domain registrar.
>>>>> So we shouldn't charge for domain registrations.
>>>>> And if I remember right, we have already discussed that on the
>>>>> mailinglist before, with the result, that we will never charge for
>>>>> registrations.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --------
>>>>> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
>>>>> You may unsubscribe by emailing
>>>>> discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org [1]
>>>>
>>>> --------
>>>> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
>>>> You may unsubscribe by emailing
>>>> discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org [1]
>>>
>>>
>>> Links:
>>> ------
>>> [1]
>>>
>http://mail.liberland.org/compose?To=discuss%2dunsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --------
>>> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
>>> You may unsubscribe by emailing
>>> discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
>>
>>
>>
>> --------
>> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
>> You may unsubscribe by emailing
>discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org

--------
You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org