Discuss mailing list

[<vv AT cgs.pw>]

You're quite right. And you're also welcome to
participate in that discussion.

In any case, I'm ok with this TLD and don't
see any other problems.

~ Ole


On Thu, 20 Jul 2017 22:18:36 +0100
Al Beano <albino AT autistici.org> wrote:

> If you're expecting new TLD operators to demonstrate a
> working website, this should be listed as a requirement
> on the wiki. 
> 
> Regardless, I'll 'withdraw' my suggestion that we vote on
> the .cyb TLD and defer it to whenever the web interface
> is up and running. 
> 
> Cheers
> albino 
> 
> On 20 July 2017 21:13:01 BST, Jeff Taylor
> <shdwdrgn AT sourpuss.net> wrote:
> >Only because we've had problems with this aspect several
> >times in the past, it would be nice to see that you have
> >an online website which can
> >
> >handle at least the basic domain settings and generate a
> >working TLD zone file.  This requirement hasn't been
> >spelled out in the opennic rules, but I think a
> >significant number of members would like to see this
> >added.
> >
> >On 07/20/2017 01:35 PM, Al Beano wrote:  
> >> If this sentiment is held by other members of the
> >> community, I would be happy to hold off the vote until
> >> we can provide this.
> >>
> >> albino
> >>
> >> On 2017-07-20 19:30, Fusl Dash wrote:  
> >>> IMHO, TLDs should have a working demo system for
> >>> domain  
> >administration  
> >>> online before calling for a vote. Unless such a
> >>> system exists, my  
> >vote  
> >>> for this domain is negative.  
> >
> >
> >
> >------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> >
> >--------
> >You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. 
> >You may unsubscribe by emailing
> >discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org  
>