Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

discuss - Re: [opennic-discuss] Vote: .cyb TLD

discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org

Subject: Discuss mailing list

List archive

Re: [opennic-discuss] Vote: .cyb TLD


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Christopher <weblionx AT gmail.com>
  • To: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
  • Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] Vote: .cyb TLD
  • Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2017 20:49:37 -0400

I'm voting no until they get a working registration system. Nothing to
do with rules, just my feeling on it. Can always hold another vote
once in place. No problems with the idea and charter, though.

On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 6:27 PM, <vv AT cgs.pw> wrote:
> Sounds good. I think you've done the work that's
> required, and certainly up to snuff compared to
> some applications we've voted on.
>
> That said, I think we should start a separate
> discussion about requirements and process. This
> stuff needs to be clearly delineated for the
> sake of the organization as well as for the sake
> of future applicants.
>
> ~ Ole
>
>
> My feeling is
>
> On Fri, 21 Jul 2017 22:57:22 +0100
> Al Beano <albino AT autistici.org> wrote:
>
>> To follow this up: the general consensus seems to be that
>> we should vote _now_ according to OpenNIC's current
>> requirements for new TLDs.
>>
>> That means the vote can continue and will end one week
>> after my initial email was sent.
>>
>> I thought it was worth clearing this up because there was
>> some uncertainty as to whether it was appropriate to vote
>> at this stage.
>>
>> On 20 July 2017 22:18:36 BST, Al Beano
>> <albino AT autistici.org> wrote:
>> >If you're expecting new TLD operators to demonstrate a
>> >working website, this should be listed as a requirement
>> >on the wiki.
>> >
>> >Regardless, I'll 'withdraw' my suggestion that we vote
>> >on the .cyb TLD and defer it to whenever the web
>> >interface is up and running.
>> >
>> >Cheers
>> >albino
>> >
>> >On 20 July 2017 21:13:01 BST, Jeff Taylor
>> ><shdwdrgn AT sourpuss.net> wrote:
>> >>Only because we've had problems with this aspect
>> >>several times in the past, it would be nice to see that
>> >>you have an online website which
>> >can
>> >>
>> >>handle at least the basic domain settings and generate
>> >>a working TLD zone file. This requirement hasn't been
>> >>spelled out in the opennic rules, but I think a
>> >>significant number of members would like to see this
>> >>added.
>> >>
>> >>On 07/20/2017 01:35 PM, Al Beano wrote:
>> >>> If this sentiment is held by other members of the
>> >>> community, I would be happy to hold off the vote
>> >>> until we can provide this.
>> >>>
>> >>> albino
>> >>>
>> >>> On 2017-07-20 19:30, Fusl Dash wrote:
>> >>>> IMHO, TLDs should have a working demo system for
>> >>>> domain
>> >>administration
>> >>>> online before calling for a vote. Unless such a
>> >>>> system exists, my
>> >>vote
>> >>>> for this domain is negative.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>--------
>> >>You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
>> >>You may unsubscribe by emailing
>> >>discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >--------
>> >You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
>> >You may unsubscribe by emailing
>> >discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
>>
>
>
>
>
> --------
> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
> You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
>



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page