Discuss mailing list

[<vv AT cgs.pw>]

I know you're busy, and that's fair enough, but if you
can't keep up I think it's wrong to mislabel that
as "rushed". It's not rushed for those of us who
do keep up. :)

That said, calling for more discussion is reasonable.
I too have questions. However, I have the same
questions about some of the existing OpenNIC TLDs.

Regards,
         Ole


On Thu, 28 Sep 2017 15:20:11 +0000
Jonah Aragon <jonah AT triplebit.net> wrote:

> I vote no. This whole proposal seems very rushed and I
> haven’t really had a chance to keep up with anything. And
> if I haven’t kept up with all these discussions I’m
> willing to guess a more than insignificant portion of the
> community also has more they’d like answered, since I try
> to stay up to date and active around here.
> 
> I think we’ve discussed a lot of topics that I don’t
> believe were fully answered here in a satisfactory way by
> the owner of this proposal, and I’d like more time to
> discuss these concerns before approval.
> 
> Jonah
> 
> On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 4:33 AM Dmitry S. Nikolaev
> <dn AT mega-net.ru> wrote:
> 
> > Sorry, forget to write UTC... My bad :(
> >
> >
> > *This vote will end at 5 Oct 2017 07:00:0 UTC *
> >
> > With best regards, Dmitry S. Nikolaev
> > virus_net
> >
> > On 28.09.2017 12:28, Dmitry S. Nikolaev wrote:
> >
> > Ok, accepted.
> > *This vote will end at 5 Oct 2017 07:00:00*.
> >
> > With best regards, Dmitry S. Nikolaev
> > virus_net
> >
> > On 28.09.2017 12:26, 6161 wrote:
> >
> > I suggest *5 Oct 2017 06:55:20*.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --------
> > You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
> > You may unsubscribe by emailing
> > discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
> >