Discuss mailing list

[Jonah Aragon <jonah AT triplebit.net>]

All votes should be in a new thread by the way , this vote wasn’t in line 
with our policies in the first place. How about the organizers of this 
project modify the charter and start the vote again in a new message so 
people following the list can actually tell there’s a vote going on vs 
continued discussion. 

Jonah

Sent from my iPhone

> On Sep 30, 2017, at 10:47 AM, Christopher <weblionx AT gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Okay, but this vote is on things as they stand, if you're going to
> change the charter it requires a new vote, as people who previously
> voted may not approve of the changes.
> 
>> On Sat, Sep 30, 2017 at 4:26 AM, 6161 <6161 AT protonmail.ch> wrote:
>> I'm pretty sure that what he meant is that the naysayers here should not
>> make up lame excuses to vote no like "You have never sent a charter to the
>> ML".
>> 
>> This is false. The charter has been sent around at least two times, here 
>> are
>> the timestamps: "Mon, 18 Sep 2017 09:18:57 +0000 (UTC)" & "Tue, 19 Sep 2017
>> 14:45:47 +0000 (UTC)".
>> 
>> If you vote no because "I still have questions" why do you not just ask
>> these questions? Good Example of making a suggestion: "Fri, 29 Sep 2017
>> 19:11:23 +0000 (UTC)" by Rouben.
>> 
>> -------- Original Message --------
>> Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] [VOTING] New TLD .RUS
>> Local Time: 29 September 2017 4:38 PM
>> UTC Time: 29 September 2017 14:38
>> From: albino AT autistici.org
>> To: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 29 September 2017 14:21:47 BST, "Dmitry S. Nikolaev" <dn AT mega-net.ru>
>> wrote:
>>> *Dear OpenNIC members.*
>>> 
>>> *If you want to vote and say "NO" so just say it. Don`t search for the
>>> justification. It don`t needed.*
>>> 
>>> *Thanks.*
>> 
>> I don"t agree with this at all. To me, the justification is VERY important;
>> I didn"t vote no because I don"t like you, I did because I think the
>> proposal could be, while interesting, overall bad for OpenNIC.
>> 
>> If no-voters don"t explain _why_ they vote this way, the proposal cannot be
>> improved or revised in any meaningful way.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --------
>> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
>> You may unsubscribe by emailing 
>> discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
>> 
> 
> 
> --------
> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. 
> You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org