Discuss mailing list

[<vv AT cgs.pw>]

Good points Jonah.

Also, I think we need to have a little writeup
about our policies in this regard. I'm probably
not the only one who can't seem to find where it
says how to decide how many days the voting period
should be.

~ Ole


On Sat, 30 Sep 2017 11:49:43 -0500
Jonah Aragon <jonah AT triplebit.net> wrote:

> All votes should be in a new thread by the way , this
> vote wasn’t in line with our policies in the first place.
> How about the organizers of this project modify the
> charter and start the vote again in a new message so
> people following the list can actually tell there’s a
> vote going on vs continued discussion. 
> 
> Jonah
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
> > On Sep 30, 2017, at 10:47 AM, Christopher
> > <weblionx AT gmail.com> wrote:
> > 
> > Okay, but this vote is on things as they stand, if
> > you're going to change the charter it requires a new
> > vote, as people who previously voted may not approve of
> > the changes. 
> >> On Sat, Sep 30, 2017 at 4:26 AM, 6161
> >> <6161 AT protonmail.ch> wrote: I'm pretty sure that what
> >> he meant is that the naysayers here should not make up
> >> lame excuses to vote no like "You have never sent a
> >> charter to the ML".
> >> 
> >> This is false. The charter has been sent around at
> >> least two times, here are the timestamps: "Mon, 18 Sep
> >> 2017 09:18:57 +0000 (UTC)" & "Tue, 19 Sep 2017
> >> 14:45:47 +0000 (UTC)".
> >> 
> >> If you vote no because "I still have questions" why do
> >> you not just ask these questions? Good Example of
> >> making a suggestion: "Fri, 29 Sep 2017 19:11:23 +0000
> >> (UTC)" by Rouben.
> >> 
> >> -------- Original Message --------
> >> Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] [VOTING] New TLD .RUS
> >> Local Time: 29 September 2017 4:38 PM
> >> UTC Time: 29 September 2017 14:38
> >> From: albino AT autistici.org
> >> To: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> On 29 September 2017 14:21:47 BST, "Dmitry S.
> >> Nikolaev" <dn AT mega-net.ru> wrote:  
> >>> *Dear OpenNIC members.*
> >>> 
> >>> *If you want to vote and say "NO" so just say it.
> >>> Don`t search for the justification. It don`t needed.*
> >>> 
> >>> *Thanks.*  
> >> 
> >> I don"t agree with this at all. To me, the
> >> justification is VERY important; I didn"t vote no
> >> because I don"t like you, I did because I think the
> >> proposal could be, while interesting, overall bad for
> >> OpenNIC.
> >> 
> >> If no-voters don"t explain _why_ they vote this way,
> >> the proposal cannot be improved or revised in any
> >> meaningful way.
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> --------
> >> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
> >> You may unsubscribe by emailing
> >> discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org 
> > 
> > 
> > --------
> > You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. 
> > You may unsubscribe by emailing
> > discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org