Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

discuss - Re: [opennic-discuss] [VOTING] New TLD .RUS

discuss AT

Subject: Discuss mailing list

List archive

Re: [opennic-discuss] [VOTING] New TLD .RUS

Chronological Thread 
  • From: 6161 <6161 AT>
  • To: "discuss AT" <discuss AT>
  • Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] [VOTING] New TLD .RUS
  • Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2017 04:26:15 -0400
  • Feedback-id: he2nAMBGiaOUM50ZvIW1bEQ3xjm-VoobzWmd0aC3cHVmlzyZK2XlPb1Xj4QHfR1p25ptyP_phOhvZj6wg0vRrA==:Ext:ProtonMail

I'm pretty sure that what he meant is that the naysayers here should not make up lame excuses to vote no like "You have never sent a charter to the ML".

This is false. The charter has been sent around at least two times, here are the timestamps: "Mon, 18 Sep 2017 09:18:57 +0000 (UTC)" & "Tue, 19 Sep 2017 14:45:47 +0000 (UTC)".

If you vote no because "I still have questions" why do you not just ask these questions? Good Example of making a suggestion: "Fri, 29 Sep 2017 19:11:23 +0000 (UTC)" by Rouben.

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] [VOTING] New TLD .RUS
Local Time: 29 September 2017 4:38 PM
UTC Time: 29 September 2017 14:38
From: albino AT
To: discuss AT

On 29 September 2017 14:21:47 BST, "Dmitry S. Nikolaev" <dn AT> wrote:
>*Dear OpenNIC members.*
>*If you want to vote and say "NO" so just say it. Don`t search for the
>justification. It don`t needed.*

I don"t agree with this at all. To me, the justification is VERY important; I didn"t vote no because I don"t like you, I did because I think the proposal could be, while interesting, overall bad for OpenNIC.

If no-voters don"t explain _why_ they vote this way, the proposal cannot be improved or revised in any meaningful way.

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page