Discuss mailing list

["Dmitry S. Nikolaev" <dn AT mega-net.ru>]

Hi.

I don`t understand where you read that I said that I don`t like it.
Please reread my letters again.
As I said before:

On 29.09.2017 17:39, Dmitry S. Nikolaev wrote:

when I read theirs letters it`s look like one thing: they just look for the cause to say "no". ....

Only few members really had read all letters,  participated in
discussion and did suggestions (offers).
Even if the vote and say "no" they really justified their choice and it is understandable for me.

It`s mine opinion and I said it openly.

Also, to prove that I accept even "no":

On 29.09.2017 17:42, Dmitry S. Nikolaev wrote:

On 29.09.2017 17:38, Al Beano wrote:

 I didn't vote no because I don't like you, I did because I think the proposal could be, while interesting, overall bad for OpenNIC. 

I know it,  I know. And thank you for that.
That you really participated and read all the letters. On the:

maybe that's something for you?

I can answer that if this were something for me then I would never have joined OpenNIC. If I`am here and still talking so OpenNIC is for me.

With best regards, Dmitry S. Nikolaev
virus_net

On 04.10.2017 09:52, Fusl wrote:

On 2017-10-04 07:31, Dmitry S. Nikolaev wrote:

Even if I made a mistake, this is a reason to point me to it and not
reason to vote "no".

Every OpenNIC project member and therefore everyone on this mailing list has the right to vote yes or no, no matter for what reason. I voted no because of the reasons given and because of my very honest opinion on this TLD, the charter and the administrator who introduced it, if you can't live with this fact, democracy is maybe not something for you and you should go somewhere else... I heard that ICANN likes to ignore the opinion of independent people, maybe that's something for you?