Discuss mailing list

[Sebastian Makowiecki <soocki AT mailbox.org>]

Was thinking 6-8 months. Eight seems fair.

~ Sebastian Makowiecki

On Mon, 9 Jul, 2018 at 10:03 PM, Daniel Quintiliani <danq AT runbox.com> wrote:

6 months? -- -Dan Q On Mon, 09 Jul 2018 21:52:12 +0100, Sebastian Makowiecki <soocki AT mailbox.org> wrote:

The idea is good, one year to much, 3 months to little, in my opinion that is for what is worth. ~ Sebastian Makowiecki On Mon, 9 Jul, 2018 at 9:42 PM, Rouben <rouben AT rouben.net> wrote: > 1 year might be a bit too much... perhaps 1-3 months? > > Rouben > > > On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 2:29 PM Daniel Quintiliani <danq AT runbox.com> > wrote: >> Hi, >> >> There has been a problem of people trying to hold new votes too >> recently after their proposals lose. This includes Jonah's proposals >> to replace IRC with Discord and Sympa with Discourse, and someone >> who lost I think the .front TLD, and I did so myself with the >> .free/.libre thing. >> >> I propose there be a one year (365 day) waiting period before anyone >> can bring proposals back up for a new vote. >> >> What do you think? >> >> -- >> >> -Dan Q >> >> >> -------- >> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. >> You may unsubscribe by emailing >> discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org -------- You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org

-------- You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org